Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103908
Title: Does geo-located social media reflect the visit frequency of urban parks? A city-wide analysis using the count and content of photographs
Authors: XIAO PING SONG 
RICHARDS, DANIEL REX 
HE PEIJUN 
TAN PUAY YOK 
Issue Date: 27-Nov-2020
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: XIAO PING SONG, RICHARDS, DANIEL REX, HE PEIJUN, TAN PUAY YOK (2020-11-27). Does geo-located social media reflect the visit frequency of urban parks? A city-wide analysis using the count and content of photographs. Landscape and Urban Planning 203 : 103908. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103908
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Given the importance of parks and green spaces for outdoor recreation in cities, numerous studies have attempted to describe patterns of usage and understand their determining factors. Recently, social media has emerged as a potentially valuable tool to examine people’s use of parks. This study examines park use in Singapore based on the count and visual content of photographs geo-located within parks. Measures of park use—the number of photo-user-days (PUD)—derived from 325,173 and 94,890 photographs on the respective platforms Instagram and Flickr were compared with results from household surveys (n = 2000). We analysed the spatial attributes of parks and their relationships with PUD at an aggregated-level, and for content categories on the Flickr platform produced by automated classification: birds, wildlife, plants, flowers, recreation, water/skyscapes. In contrast to studies of large national parks, we found that PUD at city parks reflected residents’ preferences better than their frequency of visits to parks, and that park size had a limited effect on PUD. Some relationships were specific to a particular platform; Instagram users were more likely to upload photographs at parks that were closer to the coast and with more canopy cover, while Flickr users tended to do so at parks with an event space and that had lower-density housing nearby. We conclude that social media can provide reasonable assessments of park popularity, but future studies need to consider scale-effects, the integration of data sources for better accuracy, as well as a diversity of goals beyond park use.
Source Title: Landscape and Urban Planning
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/172753
ISSN: 0169-2046
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103908
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
1-s2.0-S0169204619315014-main.pdfArticle PDF12.37 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on May 20, 2022

Page view(s)

160
checked on May 12, 2022

Download(s)

5
checked on May 12, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons