Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-018-1711-2
Title: | Active area cell efficiency (19%) monocrystalline silicon solar cell fabrication using low-cost processing with small footprint laboratory tools | Authors: | Basu, Prabir K Kumbhar, Sandeep Sreejith, KP Yadav, Tarun S Kottantharayil, Anil Arora, BM Narasimhan, KL Sharma, Ashok K |
Keywords: | Limited laboratory space Small footprint processing equipments Low-cost processing Individually optimised processes High cell efficiency |
Issue Date: | Feb-2019 | Publisher: | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | Citation: | Basu, Prabir K, Kumbhar, Sandeep, Sreejith, KP, Yadav, Tarun S, Kottantharayil, Anil, Arora, BM, Narasimhan, KL, Sharma, Ashok K (2019-02). Active area cell efficiency (19%) monocrystalline silicon solar cell fabrication using low-cost processing with small footprint laboratory tools. Bulletin of Materials Science 42 (1). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-018-1711-2 | Abstract: | A high efficiency (>18%) industrial large area crystalline silicon wafer solar cell fabrication process generally requires industrial equipment with large footprint, high capital and running costs. Stricter processing window, continuous monitoring and automated functioning are the reasons for it. However, for any conventional laboratory (lab) it is always difficult to manage these requirements with limited available lab space or insufficient fund and other related resources. In this work, we report a novel way to fabricate high efficiency full area aluminium back surface field monocrystalline silicon wafer solar cells in our lab using low-cost processing with small-footprint fabrication tools for 6 inch pseudo-square industrial wafers. The novelty of our work includes optimization of every fabrication process step, e.g., texturization, emitter diffusion, emitter passivation and anti-reflection coating deposition, edge-isolation, screen printing and co-firing individually. These modifications include tuning of processing tools and processes, utility changes and inclusion of additional process steps. Beaker-based chemical processes, manual diffusion furnace, introduction of low temperature oxidation, low temperature silicon nitride deposition processes, plasma-edge isolation tool, single manual screen printer, single oven drying of metal pastes and co-firing using rapid thermal processing tools were used at our lab. For our cells, actual and active area efficiencies of 18.5 and 19% (measured under AM1.5G 1 Sun condition), respectively, were achieved. © Indian Academy of Sciences. | Source Title: | Bulletin of Materials Science | URI: | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/171170 | ISSN: | 02504707 09737669 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12034-018-1711-2 |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revised_Full_paper_BOMS.pdf | 1.63 MB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Pre-print | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.