Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0097-x
Title: Deep learning in estimating prevalence and systemic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic study.
Authors: Ting, Daniel SW
Cheung, Carol Y
Nguyen, Quang
CHARUMATHI SABANAYAGAM 
LIM YONG SAN, GILBERT 
LIM ZHAN WEI 
Tan, Gavin SW
Soh, Yu Qiang
Schmetterer, Leopold
Wang, Ya Xing
Jonas, Jost B
Varma, Rohit
LEE MONG LI,JANICE 
HSU,WYNNE 
Lamoureux, Ecosse
CHENG CHING-YU 
Wong, Tien Yin
Keywords: Epidemiology
Risk factors
Issue Date: 10-Apr-2019
Publisher: Nature Research
Citation: Ting, Daniel SW, Cheung, Carol Y, Nguyen, Quang, CHARUMATHI SABANAYAGAM, LIM YONG SAN, GILBERT, LIM ZHAN WEI, Tan, Gavin SW, Soh, Yu Qiang, Schmetterer, Leopold, Wang, Ya Xing, Jonas, Jost B, Varma, Rohit, LEE MONG LI,JANICE, HSU,WYNNE, Lamoureux, Ecosse, CHENG CHING-YU, Wong, Tien Yin (2019-04-10). Deep learning in estimating prevalence and systemic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: a multi-ethnic study.. NPJ digital medicine 2 (1) : 24-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-019-0097-x
Abstract: In any community, the key to understanding the burden of a specific condition is to conduct an epidemiological study. The deep learning system (DLS) recently showed promising diagnostic performance for diabetic retinopathy (DR). This study aims to use DLS as the grading tool, instead of human assessors, to determine the prevalence and the systemic cardiovascular risk factors for DR on fundus photographs, in patients with diabetes. This is a multi-ethnic (5 races), multi-site (8 datasets from Singapore, USA, Hong Kong, China and Australia), cross-sectional study involving 18,912 patients (n = 93,293 images). We compared these results and the time taken for DR assessment by DLS versus 17 human assessors - 10 retinal specialists/ophthalmologists and 7 professional graders). The estimation of DR prevalence between DLS and human assessors is comparable for any DR, referable DR and vision-threatening DR (VTDR) (Human assessors: 15.9, 6.5% and 4.1%; DLS: 16.1%, 6.4%, 3.7%). Both assessment methods identified similar risk factors (with comparable AUCs), including younger age, longer diabetes duration, increased HbA1c and systolic blood pressure, for any DR, referable DR and VTDR (p > 0.05). The total time taken for DLS to evaluate DR from 93,293 fundus photographs was ~1 month compared to 2 years for human assessors. In conclusion, the prevalence and systemic risk factors for DR in multi-ethnic population could be determined accurately using a DLS, in significantly less time than human assessors. This study highlights the potential use of AI for future epidemiology or clinical trials for DR grading in the global communities.
Source Title: NPJ digital medicine
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/169544
ISSN: 2398-6352
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0097-x
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Deep learning in estimating prevalence and systemic risk factors for diabetic retinopathy a multi-ethnic study.pdfPublished version1.15 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.