Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Autopsy and clinical discrepancies in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case series||Authors:||Jia D.
|Issue Date:||2019||Publisher:||Elsevier||Citation:||Jia D., Neo R., Lim E., Seng T.C., MacLaren G, Ramanathan K. (2019). Autopsy and clinical discrepancies in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a case series. Cardiovascular Pathology 41 : 24-28. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpath.2019.03.001||Abstract:||Background: Extracorporeal life support is used as a salvage procedure to treat refractory cardiopulmonary failure. There are limited data addressing discrepancies between pre- and postmortem findings in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We investigated discrepancies between clinical and autopsy findings in patients placed on ECMO to assess in what proportion of patients were there significant cardiovascular or other pathologies present that were not clinically apparent prior to death. Methodology: After institutional review board approval, a list of deceased ECMO patients who underwent autopsy examination from 2004 through 2015 was obtained from our institutional database. Retrospective analyses of findings on clinical investigations done while patients were on ECMO and findings on autopsy examination were compared and stratified according to modified Goldman Criteria, which classify discrepancies into four grades depending on their impact on patient's management and mortality. Results: Of 19 patients, 18 patients had venoarterial ECMO (9 central + 5 peripheral + 4 conversions of ECMO type)and 1 patient received venovenous ECMO. Clinically unrecognized findings were found on autopsy in all patients. 56.6% of total discrepancies found were major [class I/II; e.g., myocardial infarction (MI), intracranial bleeding]. All patients had major discrepancies (class I/II)with an average of 4.21 class I discrepancies per patient. Class I discrepancies are findings which could have altered the course of treatment and survival of the patient if recognized premortem. The most common discrepancies were cardiovascular (MI 63.2%, marked cardiac remodeling 42.1%, severe coronary disease 31.6%)in nature across four classes of discrepancies. Conclusions: We found major discrepancies between premortem and postmortem diagnoses in patients who underwent ECMO. Our findings underscore difficulties in clinically diagnosing events on ECMO as well as the need for enhanced surveillance and better diagnostic techniques in ECMO patients. Further prospective studies are necessary to understand effects of ECMO on major organs.||Source Title:||Cardiovascular Pathology||URI:||https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/162624||ISSN:||10548807||DOI:||10.1016/j.carpath.2019.03.001|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on Jan 25, 2020
checked on Jan 23, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.