Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146286
Title: Workplace health promotion: Assessing the cardiopulmonary risks of the construction workforce in Hong Kong
Authors: Tin S.P.P.
Lam W.W.T.
Yoon S. 
Zhang N.
Xia N.
Zhang W.
Ma K.
Fielding R.
Keywords: glucose
high density lipoprotein
abdominal obesity
adult
Article
building industry
cardiopulmonary risk
construction worker
counseling
diabetes mellitus
dietary intake
educational status
female
glucose blood level
health hazard
health promotion
Hong Kong
human
lifestyle
major clinical study
male
metabolic syndrome X
occupational health
physical activity
risk assessment
risk factor
smoking habit
workplace
blood
feeding behavior
health promotion
Heart Diseases
hypertension
mass screening
obesity
procedures
questionnaire
risk assessment
statistics and numerical data
Adult
Construction Industry
Counseling
Feeding Behavior
Female
Health Promotion
Heart Diseases
Hong Kong
Humans
Hypertension
Life Style
Lipoproteins, HDL
Male
Mass Screening
Obesity
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Workplace
Issue Date: 2016
Citation: Tin S.P.P., Lam W.W.T., Yoon S., Zhang N., Xia N., Zhang W., Ma K., Fielding R. (2016). Workplace health promotion: Assessing the cardiopulmonary risks of the construction workforce in Hong Kong. PLoS ONE 11 (1) : e0146286. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146286
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Objective Health needs of different employee subgroups within an industry can differ. We report the results of a workplace cardiopulmonary risk assessment targeting workers and support staff in the construction industry. Methods A free worksite-based cardiopulmonary risk assessment for 1,903 workers on infrastructural contracts across Hong Kong was initiated in May 2014. Cardiopulmonary risk screening was performed in 60-minute blocks for approximately 30 workers/block with individualized feedback and lifestyle counseling. Risk profiles stratified by occupational roles are differentiated using the %2-test for categorical and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Results Most construction workers and clerks/professionals were male (83.2% and 71.2%, respectively) and Chinese (78.7% and 90.9%, respectively). Construction workers were older (mean: 44.9 years, SD 11.5) and less well-educated (6.1% received tertiary education) than clerks/professionals (35.0 years, 10.7; 72.6% received tertiary education), but more likely to be hypertensive (22.6% vs. 15.4%, p<0.001), overweight/obese (71.7% vs. 56.6%, p<0.001), centrally obese (53.1% vs. 35.5%, p<0.001), and have undesirable levels of high-density lipoprotein (41.6% vs. 35.8%, p<0.05) and diabetic levels of non-fasting blood glucose (4.3% vs. 1.6%, p<0.05). Up to 12.6% of construction workers and 9.7% of office clerks/professions had three or more metabolic syndrome risk factors. While construction workers were more likely than clerks/professionals to be daily smokers, they reported better work-related physical activity and diet. Conclusions Simple worksite health risk screening can identify potentially high-cardiopulmonary-risk construction industry employee subgroups for onward confirmatory referral. Separate cardiopulmonary health promotion strategies that account for the varying lifestyle profiles of the two employee subgroups in the industry appear justified. � Tin 2016 et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161592
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146286
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0146286.pdf244.96 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons