Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051198
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAnalysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies with Multiple Outcomes Using Penalization
dc.contributor.authorLiu J.
dc.contributor.authorHuang J.
dc.contributor.authorMa S.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-04T06:32:56Z
dc.date.available2019-11-04T06:32:56Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationLiu J., Huang J., Ma S. (2012). Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies with Multiple Outcomes Using Penalization. PLoS ONE 7 (12) : e51198. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051198
dc.identifier.issn19326203
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161360
dc.description.abstractGenome-wide association studies have been extensively conducted, searching for markers for biologically meaningful outcomes and phenotypes. Penalization methods have been adopted in the analysis of the joint effects of a large number of SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) and marker identification. This study is partly motivated by the analysis of heterogeneous stock mice dataset, in which multiple correlated phenotypes and a large number of SNPs are available. Existing penalization methods designed to analyze a single response variable cannot accommodate the correlation among multiple response variables. With multiple response variables sharing the same set of markers, joint modeling is first employed to accommodate the correlation. The group Lasso approach is adopted to select markers associated with all the outcome variables. An efficient computational algorithm is developed. Simulation study and analysis of the heterogeneous stock mice dataset show that the proposed method can outperform existing penalization methods. © 2012 Liu et al.
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceUnpaywall 20191101
dc.subjectanalytic method
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectCD3+ T lymphocyte
dc.subjectCD4 CD8 ratio
dc.subjectclassification algorithm
dc.subjectcorrelation analysis
dc.subjectgene frequency
dc.subjectgenetic analysis
dc.subjectgenetic association
dc.subjectgenetic database
dc.subjectgenotype
dc.subjectmathematical analysis
dc.subjectmathematical computing
dc.subjectmultivariate analysis of variance
dc.subjectpenalization
dc.subjectphenotype
dc.subjectsimulation
dc.subjectsingle nucleotide polymorphism
dc.subjectAlgorithms
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectComputer Simulation
dc.subjectDatabases, Genetic
dc.subjectGenetic Markers
dc.subjectGenetic Predisposition to Disease
dc.subjectGenetic Techniques
dc.subjectGenome-Wide Association Study
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLinear Models
dc.subjectMice
dc.subjectModels, Genetic
dc.subjectModels, Statistical
dc.subjectMultivariate Analysis
dc.subjectPhenotype
dc.subjectRegression Analysis
dc.subjectRisk Factors
dc.subjectMus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0051198
dc.description.sourcetitlePLoS ONE
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.pagee51198
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0051198.pdf467.37 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons