Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Health-Related Financial Catastrophe, Inequality and Chronic Illness in Bangladesh
Authors: Rahman M.M. 
Gilmour S.
Saito E.
Sultana P.
Shibuya K.
Keywords: adult
chronic disease
controlled study
cross-sectional study
economic aspect
financial deficit
health care cost
health care financing
hospital patient
major clinical study
outpatient care
private hospital
public health service
self medication
traditional healer
Catastrophic Illness
Cross-Sectional Studies
Family Characteristics
Financing, Personal
Health Expenditures
Health Services
Models, Theoretical
Socioeconomic Factors
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Rahman M.M., Gilmour S., Saito E., Sultana P., Shibuya K. (2013). Health-Related Financial Catastrophe, Inequality and Chronic Illness in Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 8 (2) : e56873. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: Background: Bangladesh has a high proportion of households incurring catastrophic health expenditure, and very limited risk sharing mechanisms. Identifying determinants of out-of-pocket (OOP) payments and catastrophic health expenditure may reveal opportunities to reduce costs and protect households from financial risk. Objective: This study investigates the determinants of high healthcare expenditure and healthcare- related financial catastrophe. Methods: A cross-sectional household survey was conducted in Rajshahi city, Bangladesh, in 2011. Catastrophic health expenditure was estimated separately based on capacity to pay and proportion of non-food expenditure. Determinants of OOP payments and financial catastrophe were estimated using double hurdle and Poisson regression models respectively. Results: On average households spent 11% of their total budgets on health, half the residents spent 7% of the monthly per capita consumption expenditure for one illness, and nearly 9% of households faced financial catastrophe. The poorest households spent less on health but had a four times higher risk of catastrophe than the richest households. The risk of financial catastrophe and the level of OOP payments were higher for users of inpatient, outpatient public and private facilities respectively compared to using self-medication or traditional healers. Other determinants of OOP payments and catastrophic expenses were economic status, presence of chronic illness in the household, and illness among children and adults. Conclusion: Households that received inpatient or outpatient private care experienced the highest burden of health expenditure. The poorest members of the community also face large, often catastrophic expenses. Chronic illness management is crucial to reducing the total burden of disease in a household and its associated increased risk of level of OOP payments and catastrophic expenses. Households can only be protected from these situations by reducing the health system's dependency on OOP payments and providing more financial risk protection. © 2013 Rahman et al.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056873
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0056873.pdf255.64 kBAdobe PDF




checked on Jan 20, 2021

Page view(s)

checked on Jan 15, 2021

Google ScholarTM



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons