Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070568
Title: Combining Evidence of Preferential Gene-Tissue Relationships from Multiple Sources
Authors: Guo J. 
Hammar M.
Öberg L.
Padmanabhuni S.S.
Bjäreland M.
Dalevi D.
Keywords: article
blood
brain
data base
evidence based medicine
expressed sequence tag
gene expression
gene identification
gene interaction
heart
human
kidney
liver
lung
mathematical analysis
microarray analysis
mouse
muscle
nonhuman
pancreas
placenta
prediction
prostate
protein expression
salivary gland
scoring system
skin
small intestine
testis
thymus
tissue distribution
tissue interaction
tissue specificity
validation study
Algorithms
Cluster Analysis
Computational Biology
Databases, Genetic
Gene Expression Profiling
Gene Expression Regulation
Humans
Organ Specificity
Issue Date: 2013
Citation: Guo J., Hammar M., Öberg L., Padmanabhuni S.S., Bjäreland M., Dalevi D. (2013). Combining Evidence of Preferential Gene-Tissue Relationships from Multiple Sources. PLoS ONE 8 (8) : e70568. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070568
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Abstract: An important challenge in drug discovery and disease prognosis is to predict genes that are preferentially expressed in one or a few tissues, i.e. showing a considerably higher expression in one tissue(s) compared to the others. Although several data sources and methods have been published explicitly for this purpose, they often disagree and it is not evident how to retrieve these genes and how to distinguish true biological findings from those that are due to choice-of-method and/or experimental settings. In this work we have developed a computational approach that combines results from multiple methods and datasets with the aim to eliminate method/study-specific biases and to improve the predictability of preferentially expressed human genes. A rule-based score is used to merge and assign support to the results. Five sets of genes with known tissue specificity were used for parameter pruning and cross-validation. In total we identify 3434 tissue-specific genes. We compare the genes of highest scores with the public databases: PaGenBase (microarray), TiGER (EST) and HPA (protein expression data). The results have 85% overlap to PaGenBase, 71% to TiGER and only 28% to HPA. 99% of our predictions have support from at least one of these databases. Our approach also performs better than any of the databases on identifying drug targets and biomarkers with known tissue-specificity. © 2013 Guo et al.
Source Title: PLoS ONE
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/161280
ISSN: 19326203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070568
Rights: Attribution 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
10_1371_journal_pone_0070568.pdf965.82 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons