Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817739834
Title: | An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach | Authors: | Lau, Mabel C. Goh, Winston D. Yap, Melvin J. |
Keywords: | Megastudy free recall item-level lexical-semantic recognition memory Female Humans Male Mental Recall Psycholinguistics Reaction Time Recognition (Psychology) Regression Analysis Verbal Learning Vocabulary Arousal Semantics |
Issue Date: | 1-Oct-2018 | Citation: | Lau, Mabel C., Goh, Winston D., Yap, Melvin J. (2018-10-01). An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (10) : 2207-2222. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817739834 | Related Dataset(s): | 10635/150860 | Abstract: | Psycholinguists have developed a number of measures to tap different aspects of a word's semantic representation. The influence of these measures on lexical processing has collectively been described as semantic richness effects. However, the effects of these word properties on memory are currently not well understood. This study examines the relative contributions of lexical and semantic variables in free recall and recognition memory at the item-level, using a megastudy approach. Hierarchical regression of recall and recognition performance on a number of lexical-semantic variables showed task-general effects where the structural component, frequency, number of senses, and arousal accounted for unique variance in both free recall and recognition memory. Task-specific effects included number of features, imageability, and body-object interaction, which accounted for unique variance in recall, whereas age of acquisition, familiarity, and extremity of valence accounted for unique variance in recognition. Forward selection regression analyses generally converged on these findings. Hierarchical regression also revealed that lexical variables accounted for more variance in recognition compared with recall, whereas semantic variables accounted for more unique variance above and beyond lexical variables in recall compared with recognition. Implications of the findings are discussed. | Source Title: | Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology | URI: | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/150825 | ISSN: | 1747-0218 | DOI: | 10.1177/1747021817739834 |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Item-level_analysis_lexical-semantic-post.docx | 113.54 kB | Microsoft Word XML | OPEN | Post-print | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.