Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817739834
Title: An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach
Authors: Lau, Mabel C.
Goh, Winston D. 
Yap, Melvin J. 
Keywords: Megastudy
free recall
item-level
lexical-semantic
recognition memory
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Recall
Psycholinguistics
Reaction Time
Recognition (Psychology)
Regression Analysis
Verbal Learning
Vocabulary
Arousal
Semantics
Issue Date: 1-Oct-2018
Citation: Lau, Mabel C., Goh, Winston D., Yap, Melvin J. (2018-10-01). An item-level analysis of lexical-semantic effects in free recall and recognition memory using the megastudy approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (10) : 2207-2222. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817739834
Related Dataset(s): 10635/150860
Abstract: Psycholinguists have developed a number of measures to tap different aspects of a word's semantic representation. The influence of these measures on lexical processing has collectively been described as semantic richness effects. However, the effects of these word properties on memory are currently not well understood. This study examines the relative contributions of lexical and semantic variables in free recall and recognition memory at the item-level, using a megastudy approach. Hierarchical regression of recall and recognition performance on a number of lexical-semantic variables showed task-general effects where the structural component, frequency, number of senses, and arousal accounted for unique variance in both free recall and recognition memory. Task-specific effects included number of features, imageability, and body-object interaction, which accounted for unique variance in recall, whereas age of acquisition, familiarity, and extremity of valence accounted for unique variance in recognition. Forward selection regression analyses generally converged on these findings. Hierarchical regression also revealed that lexical variables accounted for more variance in recognition compared with recall, whereas semantic variables accounted for more unique variance above and beyond lexical variables in recall compared with recognition. Implications of the findings are discussed.
Source Title: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/150825
ISSN: 1747-0218
DOI: 10.1177/1747021817739834
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Item-level_analysis_lexical-semantic-post.docx113.54 kBMicrosoft Word XML

OPEN

Post-printView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.