Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
DC FieldValue
dc.titleUniversity Students' Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics
dc.contributor.authorSreenivasulu, B.
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, R.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-16T08:47:08Z
dc.date.available2014-10-16T08:47:08Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationSreenivasulu, B., Subramaniam, R. (2013). University Students' Understanding of Chemical Thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education 35 (4) : 601-635. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
dc.identifier.issn09500693
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/95379
dc.description.abstractThis study explored undergraduate students' understanding of the chemistry topic of thermodynamics using a 4-tier diagnostic instrument, comprising 30 questions, and follow-up interviews. An additional objective of the study was to assess the utility of the 4-tier instrument for use in studies on alternative conceptions (ACs) as there has been no study done on it since its introduction in the literature in the year 2010. A total of 296 students majoring in Chemistry at a university in Singapore participated in this study-88 students in the preliminary study, 102 students in the pilot study and 106 students in the main study. This article reports on the results obtained with students in the main study; their age ranges from 20 to 22 years. Comprising answer and reason tiers plus associated confidence ratings, the 4-tier diagnostic instrument enabled the eliciting of 34 ACs harbored by the undergraduates as well as the strengths of these ACs. Of concern to note is that even for questions which were answered correctly, the mean confidence was not very high. The results of this study reiterate the point that thermodynamics is a topic fraught with conceptual difficulties and ACs. Based on the results from this study, the potential of the 4-tier test for AC studies is further underscored. Some implications of the study are discussed. © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAlternative conceptions
dc.subjectConfidence ratings
dc.subjectFour-tier diagnostic instrument
dc.subjectThermodynamics
dc.subjectUniversity students
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCHEMISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1080/09500693.2012.683460
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Science Education
dc.description.volume35
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page601-635
dc.identifier.isiut000327929700003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.