Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Biological filtration limits carbon availability and affects downstream biofilm formation and community structure||Authors:||Pang, C.M.
|Issue Date:||Sep-2006||Citation:||Pang, C.M., Liu, W.-T. (2006-09). Biological filtration limits carbon availability and affects downstream biofilm formation and community structure. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72 (9) : 5702-5712. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02982-05||Abstract:||Carbon removal strategies have gained popularity in the mitigation of biofouling in water reuse processes, but current biofilm-monitoring practices based on organic-carbon concentrations may not provide an accurate representation of the in situ biofilm problem. This study evaluated a submerged microtiter plate assay for direct and rapid monitoring of biofilm formation by subjecting the plates to a continuous flow of either secondary effluent (SE) or biofilter-treated secondary effluent (BF). This method was very robust, based on a high correlation (R2 = 0.92) between the biomass (given by the A600 in the microtiter plate assay) and the biovolume (determined from independent biofilms developed on glass slides under identical conditions) measurements, and revealed that the biomasses in BF biofilms were consistently lower than those in SE biofilms. The influence of the organic-carbon content on the biofilm community composition and succession was further evaluated using molecular tools. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed a group of pioneer colonizers, possibly represented by Sphingomonadaceae and Caulobacter organisms, to be common in both SE and BF biofilms. However, differences in organic-carbon availabilities in the two water samples eventually led to the selection of distinct biofilm communities. Alpha-proteobacterial populations were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization to be enriched in SE biofilms, while Betaproteobacteria were dominant in BF biofilms. Cloning analyses further demonstrated that microorganisms adapted for survival under low-substrate conditions (e.g., Aquabacterium, Caulobacter, and Legionella) were preferentially selected in the BF biofilm, suggesting that carbon limitation strategies may not achieve adequate biofouling control in the long run. Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.||Source Title:||Applied and Environmental Microbiology||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/87465||ISSN:||00992240||DOI:||10.1128/AEM.02982-05|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
checked on May 20, 2020
WEB OF SCIENCETM
checked on May 12, 2020
checked on May 10, 2020
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.