Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0134
DC FieldValue
dc.titleNew service development maturity model
dc.contributor.authorJin, D.
dc.contributor.authorChai, K.-H.
dc.contributor.authorTan, K.-C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-07T10:24:15Z
dc.date.available2014-10-07T10:24:15Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationJin, D., Chai, K.-H., Tan, K.-C. (2014). New service development maturity model. Managing Service Quality 24 (1) : 86-116. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0134
dc.identifier.issn09604529
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/87100
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to rigorously devise a new tool that helps analyze and improve NSD processes. Design/methodology/approach: An NSD maturity model (NSDMM) is theoretically developed through a combination of the maturity model concept and findings from NSD success studies. Findings: NSD success factors can be categorized into four management processes - strategy management, process formalization, knowledge management, and customer involvement. Maturity dimensions and levels are further devised for each process. It is hypothesized that a higher capability to handle these processes positively associates with higher NSD performance. Research limitations/implications: Studies on NSD success factors are often descriptive rather than prescriptive. This research identified four management processes which are important to focus on when implementing NSD projects. It is among the first to apply the maturity model in the service industry. That said, this research needs to be tested empirically. Practical implications: The proposed NSDMM enables companies to conduct evaluations of their NSD capabilities. By determining the desired maturity levels, companies can engage in continuous improvement so as to calibrate the NSD process. Originality/value: By integrating the concept of the maturity model and the NSD success studies, NSDMM serves not only as a diagnostic model to assess current NSD practices, but also as a guideline for continuous NSD process improvement. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0134
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAssessment
dc.subjectMaturiy model
dc.subjectNew service development
dc.subjectSuccess factors
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND TECH MGT
dc.contributor.departmentINDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1108/MSQ-10-2012-0134
dc.description.sourcetitleManaging Service Quality
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page86-116
dc.identifier.isiut000329476200005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.