Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/86105
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Understanding and testing for drop impact failure | |
dc.contributor.author | Seah, S.K.W. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, E.H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ranjan, R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, C.T. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mai, Y.-W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-07T09:15:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-07T09:15:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Seah, S.K.W.,Wong, E.H.,Ranjan, R.,Lim, C.T.,Mai, Y.-W. (2005). Understanding and testing for drop impact failure. Proceedings of the ASME/Pacific Rim Technical Conference and Exhibition on Integration and Packaging of MEMS, NEMS, and Electronic Systems: Advances in Electronic Packaging 2005 PART B : 1089-1094. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 0791842002 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/86105 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents the results of experiments aimed at studying the effects of drop impact on portable electronics and reproducing these effects in controllable tests. Firstly, a series of drop tests were performed on consumer products (mobile phones and PDAs) to understand how the printed circuit board (PCB) within a product behaves in actual drop conditions. These product-level drop tests show that in drop impact, there are three possible types of mechanical response which can stress the 2 nd level interconnections of CSP and BGA packages, namely. 1) flexing of the PCB on its supports, dominated by the 1st (fundamental) natural frequency; 2) flexing of the PCB resulting from direct impact or knocking against the PCB, typically dominated by higher natural frequencies; and 3) inertia loading on the solder joints due to high accelerations. Next, a series of board-level experiments were designed to separately study each of the three types of mechanical response. Board flexing due to direct impacts is the most severe response due to the strong strain amplitudes generated. Given the same input shock, the conventional board-level test - where the PCB flexes on its supports - produces much lower strain amplitudes. Inertia loading on the solder joints is practically negligible. Since PCB flexing is the main failure driver, a simple vibration test, which reproduces the strains observed in drop impact, is suggested as an alternative to time-consuming drop impact tests. Copyright © 2005 by ASME. | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dc.contributor.department | MECHANICAL ENGINEERING | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Proceedings of the ASME/Pacific Rim Technical Conference and Exhibition on Integration and Packaging of MEMS, NEMS, and Electronic Systems: Advances in Electronic Packaging 2005 | |
dc.description.volume | PART B | |
dc.description.page | 1089-1094 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.