Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.058
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIn vitro characterization of natural and synthetic dermal matrices cultured with human dermal fibroblasts
dc.contributor.authorNg, K.W.
dc.contributor.authorKhor, H.L.
dc.contributor.authorHutmacher, D.W.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-07T09:14:36Z
dc.date.available2014-10-07T09:14:36Z
dc.date.issued2004-06
dc.identifier.citationNg, K.W., Khor, H.L., Hutmacher, D.W. (2004-06). In vitro characterization of natural and synthetic dermal matrices cultured with human dermal fibroblasts. Biomaterials 25 (14) : 2807-2818. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.058
dc.identifier.issn01429612
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/85991
dc.description.abstractThe ideal dermal matrix should be able to provide the right biological and physical environment to ensure homogenous cell and extracellular matrix (ECM) distribution, as well as the right size and morphology of the neo-tissue required. Four natural and synthetic 3D matrices were evaluated in vitro as dermal matrices, namely (1) equine collagen foam, TissuFleece®, (2) acellular dermal replacement, Alloderm®, (3) knitted poly(lactic-co- glycolic acid) (10:90)-poly(ε-caprolactone) (PLGA-PCL) mesh, (4) chitosan scaffold. Human dermal fibroblasts were cultured on the specimens over 3 weeks. Cell morphology, distribution and viability were assessed by electron microscopy, histology and confocal laser microscopy. Metabolic activity and DNA synthesis were analysed via MTS metabolic assay and [3H]-thymidine uptake, while ECM protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry. TissuFleece®, Alloderm® and PLGA-PCL mesh supported cell attachment, proliferation and neo-tissue formation. However, TissuFleece® contracted to 10% of the original size while Alloderm® supported cell proliferation predominantly on the surface of the material. PLGA-PCL mesh promoted more homogenous cell distribution and tissue formation. Chitosan scaffolds did not support cell attachment and proliferation. These results demonstrated that physical characteristics including porosity and mechanical stability to withstand cell contraction forces are important in determining the success of a dermal matrix material. © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.058
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDermal replacement
dc.subjectHuman dermal fibroblasts
dc.subjectNatural and synthetic matrices
dc.subjectTissue engineering
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentBIOENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentMATERIALS SCIENCE
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.058
dc.description.sourcetitleBiomaterials
dc.description.volume25
dc.description.issue14
dc.description.page2807-2818
dc.description.codenBIMAD
dc.identifier.isiut000189133000011
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

144
checked on Nov 24, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

130
checked on Nov 24, 2020

Page view(s)

90
checked on Nov 29, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.