Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/14/1/006
Title: Equivalency of Berkovich and conical load-indentation curves
Authors: Swaddiwudhipong, S. 
Hua, J. 
Tho, K.K. 
Liu, Z.S.
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2006
Citation: Swaddiwudhipong, S., Hua, J., Tho, K.K., Liu, Z.S. (2006-01-01). Equivalency of Berkovich and conical load-indentation curves. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 14 (1) : 71-82. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/14/1/006
Abstract: The Berkovich indenter, which is one of the most commonly used indenter tips in instrumented indentation experiments, requires a tedious 3D finite element simulation. The indenter is widely idealized as a conical indenter of 70.3° half-angle to enable a substantially less demanding 2D axisymmetric modelling. Although the approach has been commonly adopted, limited studies have been performed to investigate possible deviations due to this simplification. The present study attempts to address the equivalency of the two indenters by performing extensively both 3D and 2D finite element analyses to simulate the load-displacement response of a wide range of elasto-plastic materials obeying power law strain-hardening during indentation for both Berkovich and conical indenters, respectively. It is demonstrated that the equivalency between these two indenters in terms of curvature of the loading curve is not valid across the range of material properties under study. However, it is established that if only the ratio of the remaining work done (WR) and the total work done (WT) of the load-indentation curve is of interest, this simplification can be adopted with satisfactory results. © 2006 IOP Publishing Ltd.
Source Title: Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/84581
ISSN: 09650393
DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/14/1/006
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Oct 9, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

28
checked on Oct 2, 2019

Page view(s)

65
checked on Oct 12, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.