Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01152-4
DC FieldValue
dc.titleApplication of static and dynamic liquid-phase microextraction in the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
dc.contributor.authorHou, L.
dc.contributor.authorLee, H.K.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-23T05:32:21Z
dc.date.available2014-06-23T05:32:21Z
dc.date.issued2002-11-08
dc.identifier.citationHou, L., Lee, H.K. (2002-11-08). Application of static and dynamic liquid-phase microextraction in the determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Journal of Chromatography A 976 (1-2) : 377-385. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01152-4
dc.identifier.issn00219673
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/75600
dc.description.abstractTwo modes of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), static and semi-automated dynamic, have been developed for the HPLC analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In static LPME, a small drop (3 μl) of organic solvent was held at the tip of a microsyringe needle and exposed to the sample containing the analytes, permitting extraction to occur. In semi-automated dynamic LPME, a syringe pump was used to automate the repetitive procedure of filling a microsyringe barrel that functioned as a microseparatory funnel, with fresh aliquots of sample, and expelling them after extraction. The factors influential to both techniques such as the type of organic solvent, extraction time, sampling volume, number of samplings, salt concentration and temperature were investigated. Static LPME provided high enrichment (60- to 180-fold) and simplicity. The analytical data exhibited a relative standard deviation range of 4.7-9.0%. Dynamic LPME provided higher (>280-fold) enrichment within nearly the same extraction time (≈20 min) and better precision (≤6.0%). Both methods allow the detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at μg/l levels in water by HPLC. Water samples collected from two rivers were analyzed using the methods, respectively. The results demonstrated that both modes of LPME were fast, simple and accurate. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01152-4
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEnvironmental analysis
dc.subjectExtraction methods
dc.subjectLiquid-phase microextraction
dc.subjectPolynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
dc.subjectWater analysis
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCHEMISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01152-4
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Chromatography A
dc.description.volume976
dc.description.issue1-2
dc.description.page377-385
dc.description.codenJCRAE
dc.identifier.isiut000179110100043
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.