Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Performance comparison between decision-aided maximum likelihood and adaptive decision-aided phase estimation||Authors:||Zhang, S.
Block length effect
|Issue Date:||2010||Citation:||Zhang, S.,Yu, C.,Kam, P.Y.,Chen, J. (2010). Performance comparison between decision-aided maximum likelihood and adaptive decision-aided phase estimation. IET Conference Publications 2010 (574 CP) : 253-257. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2010.1199||Abstract:||The performance of decision-aided maximum likelihood (DA ML) and adaptive decision-aided (DA) phase estimation algorithms are analytically investigated in different modulation formats. The results show that the DA ML does not suffer from constellation penalty as in the adaptive DA phase estimation, though its performance depends on the memory length. In addition, it is found that the adaptive DA algorithm is more suitable in phase-shift keying formats than in non-constant amplitude systems.||Source Title:||IET Conference Publications||URI:||http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/71400||ISBN:||9781849193146||DOI:||10.1049/cp.2010.1199|
|Appears in Collections:||Staff Publications|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.