Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/67738
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAesthetic laser marking assessment
dc.contributor.authorNg, T.W.
dc.contributor.authorYeo, S.C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T05:08:52Z
dc.date.available2014-06-18T05:08:52Z
dc.date.issued2000-04
dc.identifier.citationNg, T.W.,Yeo, S.C. (2000-04). Aesthetic laser marking assessment. Optics and Laser Technology 32 (3) : 187-191. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn00303992
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/67738
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, the CIE color difference formula was applied to evaluate four types of material surfaces; anodized aluminium, stainless steel, poly-butylene tetra-phthalate (PBT), and phenol formaldehyde, marked using a Nd:YAG laser, and viewed under three common modes of illumination; tungsten, fluorescent and daylight. The color difference values were based on the spectral reflectance readings obtained from a spectrophotometer. Each material exhibited different color difference trends in relation to marking speed for the different modes of illumination. Nevertheless, general comparisons could be made in terms of operational marking speeds and the maximal color difference values for each material. © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY PROGRAMME
dc.description.sourcetitleOptics and Laser Technology
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page187-191
dc.description.codenOLTCA
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.