Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(855)
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePerformance of hybrid-fiber ECC blast/shelter panels subjected to drop weight impact
dc.contributor.authorZhang, J.
dc.contributor.authorMaalej, M.
dc.contributor.authorQuek, S.T.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T08:22:51Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T08:22:51Z
dc.date.issued2007-10
dc.identifier.citationZhang, J., Maalej, M., Quek, S.T. (2007-10). Performance of hybrid-fiber ECC blast/shelter panels subjected to drop weight impact. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19 (10) : 855-863. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(855)
dc.identifier.issn08991561
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/65981
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the results of an experimental study to evaluate the damage and failure mode of hybrid-fiber engineered cementitious composite (ECC) panels caused by large projectiles or fragments. The aim is to quantify the extent to which hybrid-fiber ECC improves the resistance of blast panels against impact loading. Drop weight tests were conducted on full-scale hybrid-fiber ECC blast/shelter panels (2 m × 1 m × 0.05-0.1 m) to study their response and performance under impact loading. Conventional steel reinforced concrete (RC) and steel fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) blast panels were also tested to identify the advantages of using ECC in this application. Both the drop weight projectile with a hemispherical head and the panel specimen were instrumented to facilitate evaluation of the global and local response. The impact resistance of blast panels of different materials is evaluated in terms of the extent of damage, energy absorption capacity and residual resistance against multiple impacts. The drop weight impact test results showed that the hybrid-fiber ECC panels exhibit lesser damage, significantly improved impact resistance against multiple impacts and improved ductility and energy absorption capacity compared to both RC and FRC counterparts. A single degree of freedom model was adopted to analyze the global flexural behavior of RC and ECC panels. © 2007 ASCE.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(855)
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComposite materials
dc.subjectDamage
dc.subjectEnergy absorption
dc.subjectExperimentation
dc.subjectFailures
dc.subjectPanels
dc.subjectProjectiles
dc.subjectWeight
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCIVIL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:10(855)
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Materials in Civil Engineering
dc.description.volume19
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.page855-863
dc.identifier.isiut000249614500007
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.