Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.03.022
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEvaluation of control configurations for a depropaniser
dc.contributor.authorChawla, I.
dc.contributor.authorRangaiah, G.P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T07:40:32Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T07:40:32Z
dc.date.issued2008-09
dc.identifier.citationChawla, I., Rangaiah, G.P. (2008-09). Evaluation of control configurations for a depropaniser. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 86 (9) : 977-988. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.03.022
dc.identifier.issn02638762
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/63871
dc.description.abstractDistillation columns are highly coupled and non-linear, and have major impact on the utilities consumption and product quality. By proper design of their controls, energy consumption, product variability, operator intervention and equipment downtime can be reduced. Thus, selection of proper controls for distillation columns is both challenging and critical. Although extensive literature have been published on various aspects of distillation control, viz., level controller tuning, ratioing manipulated variables and turndown operation, there is no comprehensive study on control evaluation considering all aspects and rigorous simulation. In particular, turndown operation has received little attention in control research. This work deals with the composition control of distillation columns considering depropaniser as an example and using rigorous simulation. Effect of level controller tuning, ratioing the manipulated variable and turndown operation on the performance of several control structures to reject step disturbances in feed flow rate and composition, and sinusoidal disturbance in feed composition, is studied. Both single- and dual-ended composition control of the depropaniser are considered. Results of this study show the need and importance of a comprehensive and rigorous analysis including column operation far away from the design conditions, for optimal design of column control. © 2008 The Institution of Chemical Engineers.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2008.03.022
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectComposition control
dc.subjectControl structure
dc.subjectDepropaniser
dc.subjectDynamic simulation
dc.subjectHysys
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCHEMICAL & BIOMOLECULAR ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.cherd.2008.03.022
dc.description.sourcetitleChemical Engineering Research and Design
dc.description.volume86
dc.description.issue9
dc.description.page977-988
dc.description.codenCERDE
dc.identifier.isiut000259849500002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.