Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/63023
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAnalysis of reliability experiments with blocking
dc.contributor.authorXiao, L.
dc.contributor.authorTang, L.C.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T06:59:16Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T06:59:16Z
dc.date.issued2013-06
dc.identifier.citationXiao, L.,Tang, L.C. (2013-06). Analysis of reliability experiments with blocking. Quality Technology and Quantitative Management 10 (2) : 141-160. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn16843703
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/63023
dc.description.abstractMany reliability life tests contain blocking or subsampling. This is often the case when treatments are directly applied to test stands rather than individual specimen. Or, when specimens come from different production batches. Incorrectly assuming completely randomized design underestimates the standard errors due to overstating the true experimental degrees of freedom. In this paper, a survey of existing approaches to analyzing reliability life tests data under subsampling is conducted. We propose a method that integrates the idea of frailty, which accounts for the subsampling effect, and the technique of multiple imputation for analyzing experimental data. A step-by-step description of the approach is presented, followed by a numerical example based on a popular reliability dataset. Finally, comprehensive comparison studies between the proposed method and existing methods are conducted. © ICAQM 2013.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBlocking
dc.subjectFrailty
dc.subjectMultiple imputation
dc.subjectReliability life test
dc.subjectSubsampling
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentINDUSTRIAL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING
dc.description.sourcetitleQuality Technology and Quantitative Management
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page141-160
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.