Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/10407780701301652
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe influence of strip location on the pressure drop and heat transfer performance of a slotted fin
dc.contributor.authorTao, W.Q.
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Y.P.
dc.contributor.authorLee, T.S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T06:35:55Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T06:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2007-01
dc.identifier.citationTao, W.Q., Cheng, Y.P., Lee, T.S. (2007-01). The influence of strip location on the pressure drop and heat transfer performance of a slotted fin. Numerical Heat Transfer; Part A: Applications 52 (5) : 463-480. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407780701301652
dc.identifier.issn10407782
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/61502
dc.description.abstractIn this article, a numerical study is conducted to predict the air-side heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of slit fin-and-tube heat transfer surfaces. A three-dimensional steady laminar model is applied, and the heat conduction in the fins is also considered. Five types of slit fins, named slit 1, slit 2, slit 3, slit 4, and slit 5, are investigated, which have the same global geometry dimensions and the same numbers of strips on the fin surfaces. The only difference among the five slit fins lies in the strip arrangement. Slit 1 has all the strips located in the front part of the fin surface, then, following the order from slit 1 to slit 5, the strip number in the front part decreases and, correspondingly, the strip number in the rear part increases, so that all the strips of slit 5 are located in the rear part. Furthermore, slit 1 and slit 5, slit 2 and slit 4, have a symmetrical strip arrangement along the flow direction. The numerical results show that, following the order from slit 1 and slit 5, the heat transfer rate increases at first, reaching a maximum value at slit 3, which has the strip arrangement of "front coarse and rear dense"; after that, it begins to decrease, as does the fin efficiency. Although they have the symmetrical strip arrangement along the flow direction, slit 5 has 7% more Nusselt number than slit 1, and slit 4 also has 7% more Nusselt number than slit 2, which shows that strip arrangement in the rear part is more effective than that in the front part. Then the difference of heat transfer performance among five slit fins is analyzed from the viewpoint of thermal resistance, which shows that when the thermal resistances in the front and rear parts are nearly identical, the optimum enhanced heat transfer fin can be obtained. This quantitative rule, in conjunction with the previously published qualitative principle of "front sparse and rear dense," can give both quantitative and qualitative guides to the design of efficient slotted fin surfaces. Finally, the influence of fin material on the performance of enhanced-heat-transfer fins is discussed. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10407780701301652
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1080/10407780701301652
dc.description.sourcetitleNumerical Heat Transfer; Part A: Applications
dc.description.volume52
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.page463-480
dc.description.codenNHAAE
dc.identifier.isiut000248451200004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

29
checked on Mar 3, 2021

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

25
checked on Mar 3, 2021

Page view(s)

85
checked on Mar 1, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.