Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePerformance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: Experiments and finite element simulations
dc.contributor.authorTan, L.B.
dc.contributor.authorTse, K.M.
dc.contributor.authorLee, H.P.
dc.contributor.authorTan, V.B.C.
dc.contributor.authorLim, S.P.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T06:30:44Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T06:30:44Z
dc.date.issued2012-12
dc.identifier.citationTan, L.B., Tse, K.M., Lee, H.P., Tan, V.B.C., Lim, S.P. (2012-12). Performance of an advanced combat helmet with different interior cushioning systems in ballistic impact: Experiments and finite element simulations. International Journal of Impact Engineering 50 : 99-112. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003
dc.identifier.issn0734743X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/61076
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents results from both experiments and numerical simulations of frontal and lateral ballistic impacts on a Hybrid III headform equipped with Advanced Combat Helmets (ACH) of two different interior cushioning designs, namely the strap-netting system and the Oregon Aero (OA) foam padding. It aims to study the differences between two different impact orientations for these two different interior cushioning systems. The experiments involve frontal and lateral ballistic impacts of a 11.9 g spherical steel projectile traveling at speeds of approximately 200 m/s, striking on the helmet-cushion-headform assemblies. The dynamic interaction between various components of the helmet-cushion-headform assemblies are investigated with the use of high-speed photography while post-test evaluation of the damaged helmets are performed using visual observation, optical microscopy and computed tomography (CT) scan. A series of ballistic impact simulations with finite element (FE) models of the two assemblies reconstructed from CT images, are performed to correlate with experimental results. The commercial software, Abaqus™, is used for the FE analyses. In general, there is reasonable correlation between numerical and experimental observations and on quantitative parameters, such as head accelerations, helmet damage and deflections. It is also found that softer foams with low stiffness are more effective as shock absorbing cushion against ballistic impacts under certain condition. Additionally, results of the two interior cushioning systems are compared with various injury criteria to assess their acceleration levels. It is found that, for frontal impact, the helmet with strap-netting system fails both the Wayne State Tolerance Curve (WSTC) and Federal Motor Vehicles Safety Standards (FMVSS) 218 criteria while the one with OA foam-padding passes both. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBallistic impact
dc.subjectHybrid III headform
dc.subjectKEVLAR® helmet
dc.subjectOregon Aero (OA) interior foam padding
dc.subjectStrap-netting interior cushion
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.06.003
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Impact Engineering
dc.description.volume50
dc.description.page99-112
dc.description.codenIJIED
dc.identifier.isiut000311530500012
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.