Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500469610
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCutting force denoising in micro-milling tool condition monitoring
dc.contributor.authorZhu, K.
dc.contributor.authorHong, G.S.
dc.contributor.authorWong, Y.S.
dc.contributor.authorWang, W.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T06:16:03Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T06:16:03Z
dc.date.issued2008-08
dc.identifier.citationZhu, K., Hong, G.S., Wong, Y.S., Wang, W. (2008-08). Cutting force denoising in micro-milling tool condition monitoring. International Journal of Production Research 46 (16) : 4391-4408. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540500469610
dc.identifier.issn00207543
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/59827
dc.description.abstractAn independent component analysis (ICA) algorithm for cutting force denoising was applied in micro-milling tool condition monitoring. In micro-milling, the comparatively small cutting force signal is prone to contamination by relatively large noise, and as a result it is important to denoise the force signal before further processing it. However, the traditional denoising methods, based on Gaussian noise assumption, lose here because the noise is identified as containing a high non-Gaussian component in the experiment. ICA was recently developed to deal with the blind source separation (BSS) problem. It solves the BSS problem by measuring the non-Gaussianity of the signal and it is particularly effective in the separation of non-Gaussian signals. This approach employs fixed-point ICA (FastICA), assuming the noises are sources and the force signal is an instantaneous mixture of sources and by treating the signal denoising process as a BSS. The results are illustrated both in time and frequency domains. The FastICA denoising performances are compared with the popular wavelet thresholding. The results show that FastICA performs better than wavelet. Theoretical discussion of the nature of ICA and wavelet thresholding supports the results: ICA separates both Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise sources, while wavelet only suppresses Gaussian noise.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207540500469610
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCutting forces
dc.subjectIndependent component analysis (ICA)
dc.subjectMicro-milling
dc.subjectNon-Gaussianity
dc.subjectWavelet thresholding
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1080/00207540500469610
dc.description.sourcetitleInternational Journal of Production Research
dc.description.volume46
dc.description.issue16
dc.description.page4391-4408
dc.description.codenIJPRB
dc.identifier.isiut000257264500003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.