Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026421606939
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDevelopment of thin elastomeric composite membranes for biomedical applications
dc.contributor.authorTeoh, S.H.
dc.contributor.authorTang, Z.G.
dc.contributor.authorRamakrishna, S.
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T05:10:56Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T05:10:56Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationTeoh, S.H., Tang, Z.G., Ramakrishna, S. (1999). Development of thin elastomeric composite membranes for biomedical applications. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 10 (6) : 343-352. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026421606939
dc.identifier.issn09574530
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/58105
dc.description.abstractA breakthrough has been made in blending of two immiscible biocompatible polymers to form thin transparent interpenetrating network composite membranes (CM) with exceptional improvement in properties. Two immiscible polymers, namely the biaxially drawn ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) film and polyether polyurethane (PU) were used. The fabrication included solution casting and heat compaction. During the fabrication, the CM still preserved the orientation of UHMWPE fibers but introduced the interpenetration of PU in UHMWPE film. The intimate interaction of PU with UHMWPE fibers was viewed through the transparency of CM. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) data showed the melting temperature (T(m)) of UHMWPE increased by about 10°C in CM and about 5°C in heat-compacted membranes (HCM). Morphological observations indicated that CM presented a layered structure while HCM was a dense material without obvious void inclusions. The ultimate tensile strength and relative Young's modulus of CM are about 62 MPa and 460 MPa, respectively. They are about four times greater in strength and 150 times greater in modulus compared with those of PU. Heat compaction resulted in a membrane with nearly five times the tensile strength and 50 times the Young's modulus of PU. The engineered ultimate strain of CM is about 26%, 8% more than that of the porous UHMWPE film while about 70% of HCM, which is a 50% increase achieved through heat compaction. The tensile fracture toughness is about 93 mJ for CM and 211 mJ for HCM, two and five times that for the porous UHMWPE film, respectively. The significant modification on the properties of the heat-compacted composite may raise broad interest in using the CM to develop membrane-related devices and organ covers in biomedical applications.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026421606939
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentINST OF MATERIALS RESEARCH & ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL & PRODUCTION ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1023/A:1026421606939
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
dc.description.volume10
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page343-352
dc.description.codenJSMME
dc.identifier.isiut000080793300004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.