Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.054
DC FieldValue
dc.titleApplication of statistics and machine learning for risk stratification of heritable cardiac arrhythmias
dc.contributor.authorWasan, P.S.
dc.contributor.authorUttamchandani, M.
dc.contributor.authorMoochhala, S.
dc.contributor.authorYap, V.B.
dc.contributor.authorYap, P.H.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-19T02:50:08Z
dc.date.available2014-05-19T02:50:08Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-01
dc.identifier.citationWasan, P.S., Uttamchandani, M., Moochhala, S., Yap, V.B., Yap, P.H. (2013-06-01). Application of statistics and machine learning for risk stratification of heritable cardiac arrhythmias. Expert Systems with Applications 40 (7) : 2476-2486. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.054
dc.identifier.issn09574174
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/52793
dc.description.abstractIn the clinical management of heritable cardiac arrhythmias (HCAs), risk stratification is of prime importance. The ability to predict the likelihood of individuals within a sub-population contracting a pathology potentially resulting in sudden death gives subjects the opportunity to put preventive measures in place, and make the necessary lifestyle adjustments to increase their chances of survival. In this paper, we review classical methods that have commonly been used in clinical studies for risk stratification in HCA, such as odds ratios, hazard ratios, Chi-squared tests, and logistic regression, discussing their benefits and shortcomings. We then explore less common and more recent statistical and machine learning methods adopted by other biological studies and assess their applicability in the study of HCA. These methods typically support the multivariate analysis of risk factors, such as decision trees, neural networks, support vector machines and Bayesian classifiers. They have been adopted for feature selection of predictor variables in risk stratification studies, and in some cases, prove better than classical methods. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.054
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBrugada
dc.subjectLong QT
dc.subjectMachine learning
dc.subjectRisk stratification
dc.subjectStatistics
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentSAW SWEE HOCK SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
dc.contributor.departmentSTATISTICS & APPLIED PROBABILITY
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.eswa.2012.10.054
dc.description.sourcetitleExpert Systems with Applications
dc.description.volume40
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.page2476-2486
dc.description.codenESAPE
dc.identifier.isiut000315616500011
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.