Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.015
DC FieldValue
dc.titleModeling shear modulus distribution in magnetic resonance elastography with piecewise constant level sets
dc.contributor.authorLi, B.N.
dc.contributor.authorChui, C.K.
dc.contributor.authorOng, S.H.
dc.contributor.authorNumano, T.
dc.contributor.authorWashio, T.
dc.contributor.authorHomma, K.
dc.contributor.authorChang, S.
dc.contributor.authorVenkatesh, S.
dc.contributor.authorKobayashi, E.
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-24T07:23:03Z
dc.date.available2014-04-24T07:23:03Z
dc.date.issued2012-04
dc.identifier.citationLi, B.N., Chui, C.K., Ong, S.H., Numano, T., Washio, T., Homma, K., Chang, S., Venkatesh, S., Kobayashi, E. (2012-04). Modeling shear modulus distribution in magnetic resonance elastography with piecewise constant level sets. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 30 (3) : 390-401. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.015
dc.identifier.issn0730725X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/50981
dc.description.abstractMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is designed for imaging the mechanical properties of soft tissues. However, the interpretation of shear modulus distribution is often confusing and cumbersome. For reliable evaluation, a common practice is to specify the regions of interest and consider regional elasticity. Such an experience-dependent protocol is susceptible to intrapersonal and interpersonal variability. In this study we propose to remodel shear modulus distribution with piecewise constant level sets by referring to the corresponding magnitude image. Optimal segmentation and registration are achieved by a new hybrid level set model comprised of alternating global and local region competitions. Experimental results on the simulated MRE data sets show that the mean error of elasticity reconstruction is 11.33% for local frequency estimation and 18.87% for algebraic inversion of differential equation. Piecewise constant level set modeling is effective to improve the quality of shear modulus distribution, and facilitates MRE analysis and interpretation. © 2012 Elsevier Inc.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.015
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectElasticity imaging
dc.subjectLevel set methods
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance elastography
dc.subjectRegistration
dc.subjectSegmentation
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
dc.contributor.departmentELECTRICAL & COMPUTER ENGINEERING
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.mri.2011.09.015
dc.description.sourcetitleMagnetic Resonance Imaging
dc.description.volume30
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page390-401
dc.description.codenMRIMD
dc.identifier.isiut000300966500011
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.