Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826f7a67
DC FieldValue
dc.titleRidge augmentation with mineralized block allografts: Clinical and histological evaluation of 8 cases treated with the 3-dimensional block technique
dc.contributor.authorJacotti, M.
dc.contributor.authorWang, H.-L.
dc.contributor.authorFu, J.-H.
dc.contributor.authorZamboni, G.
dc.contributor.authorBernardello, F.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T07:23:48Z
dc.date.available2013-10-16T07:23:48Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationJacotti, M., Wang, H.-L., Fu, J.-H., Zamboni, G., Bernardello, F. (2012). Ridge augmentation with mineralized block allografts: Clinical and histological evaluation of 8 cases treated with the 3-dimensional block technique. Implant Dentistry 21 (6) : 444-448. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826f7a67
dc.identifier.issn10566163
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/47140
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Bone augmentation is frequently used to create sufficient bone volume for ideal implant placement. Severely resorbed ridges require extensive bone augmentation in the form of block allografts. A 3-dimensional graft technique has been developed to augment atrophic areas. This technique involves modifying the graft on a sterile prototype of the recipient site before the surgery. This article investigates the clinical and histological outcomes of ridge augmentation using this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight partially edentulous patients were recruited. Ridge augmentations were performed using block allografts, preadjusted, based on sterile prototypes of the recipient bed before the surgeries. After 8 months, 20 implants were inserted into the grafted sites. Eight bone cores were harvested for histological analysis. RESULT: Highly vital and mineralized bone with lamellar organization was observed at the grafted sites. CONCLUSION: Having the ability to modify the allogeneic block grafts to fit the recipient sites before the surgery minimized the surgical time and risk of postoperative complications such as infection. In addition, the clinician could concentrate fully on achieving tension-free primary wound closure. Copyright © 2012 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826f7a67
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectallografts
dc.subjectblock graft
dc.subjectguided bone regeneration
dc.subjecthistology
dc.subjectonlay blocks
dc.subjectridge augmentation
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDENTISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1097/ID.0b013e31826f7a67
dc.description.sourcetitleImplant Dentistry
dc.description.volume21
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.page444-448
dc.identifier.isiut000311146600002
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.