Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0
DC FieldValue
dc.titleDonation of surplus frozen embryos for stem cell research or fertility treatment - Should medical professionals and healthcare institutions be allowed to exercise undue influence on the informed decision of their former patients?
dc.contributor.authorHeng, B.C.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T07:17:40Z
dc.date.available2013-10-16T07:17:40Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationHeng, B.C. (2006). Donation of surplus frozen embryos for stem cell research or fertility treatment - Should medical professionals and healthcare institutions be allowed to exercise undue influence on the informed decision of their former patients?. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 23 (9-10) : 381-382. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0
dc.identifier.issn10580468
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/47128
dc.description.abstractThe increasing availability of clinical assisted reproduction has led to an accumulated surplus of frozen embryos within fertility clinics worldwide. Couples that have attained success in clinical assisted reproduction, and have no further desire to reproduce; are often faced with an agonizing dilemma on what to do with their surplus frozen embryos-whether to simply discard them, or donate either for scientific research or to other infertile couples. There is a risk that persons or institutions directly involved in procuring donated embryos will prioritize their own interests over the informed choice of the patient to donate either for scientific research or to other infertile couples. Very often, formerly infertile couples who have attained reproductive success feel an overwhelming sense of gratitude to the fertility doctor handling their treatment. Hence, there is a risk of medical professionals exercising undue influence on their former patients, to sway the final decision to their preferred outcome. In the private practice setting, the preferred outcome would likely be donation for the treatment of other infertile couples; whilst in the case of medical professionals affiliated with research or academic institutions, the preferred outcome would likely be donation for stem cell research. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCryopreserved
dc.subjectDisposal
dc.subjectDonation
dc.subjectEmbryos
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectStem cells
dc.subjectTreatment
dc.typeReview
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DENTISTRY)
dc.description.doi10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
dc.description.volume23
dc.description.issue9-10
dc.description.page381-382
dc.description.codenJARGE
dc.identifier.isiut000242658900004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.