Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46899
DC FieldValue
dc.titleInfluence of finishing time on marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems
dc.contributor.authorYap, A.U.J.
dc.contributor.authorAng, H.Q.
dc.contributor.authorChong, K.C.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T05:52:41Z
dc.date.available2013-10-16T05:52:41Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationYap, A.U.J.,Ang, H.Q.,Chong, K.C. (1998). Influence of finishing time on marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 25 (11) : 871-876. ScholarBank@NUS Repository.
dc.identifier.issn0305182X
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46899
dc.description.abstractAlthough variation in finishing techniques has been shown to affect microleakage, little research has been published on the influence of finishing time on the marginal sealing ability of new generation composite bonding systems. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of finishing time on the enamel and dentine marginal sealing ability of four new generation composite systems. Two class V preparations, which were solely in enamel or dentine, were made on the buccal surfaces of 96 freshly extracted molar teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 24 and restored with composite resin (Silux Plus®) utilizing the following bonding systems: Scotchbond Multi-purpose®, Fuji Bond LC®, Prime & Bond 2-0® and Bisco One-step®. Half of the restorations in each group were finished immediately after light polymerization and stored for 1 week. For the remaining restorations, finishing was delayed for 1 week. The storage medium was isotonic saline at 37°C throughout the experiment. All restorations were then thermocycled, subjected to dye penetration testing, sectioned and scored. The results suggest that the finishing of composite restorations, bonded with the bonding systems evaluated, should be carried out immediately after light polymerization. Delayed finishing does not improve but instead can be detrimental to the marginal seal of the restorations. The effects of delayed finishing are, however, both bonding system and tissue specific. © 1998 Blackwell Science Ltd.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentRESTORATIVE DENTISTRY
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.description.volume25
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page871-876
dc.description.codenJORHB
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.