Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.590078
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCombined effect of fluoride and laser on the crystalline structure of human enamel - A pilot study
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Y.
dc.contributor.authorHsu, C.Y.S.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-16T05:38:46Z
dc.date.available2013-10-16T05:38:46Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationDeng, Y., Hsu, C.Y.S. (2005). Combined effect of fluoride and laser on the crystalline structure of human enamel - A pilot study. Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE 5687 : 42-49. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.590078
dc.identifier.issn16057422
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46783
dc.description.abstractRecently, it was documented that the combined treatment of fluoride & laser can induce an even greater increase in caries resistance than laser or fluoride treatment alone. However, the real mechanisms remained unclear. The aim of our present pilot study is to characterize the crystallographic changes in the human enamel treated with fluoride (F), laser (L), and combined fluoride-laser (LF) therapies using Micro-XRD and Micro-FTIR, so as to elucidate the true mechanisms of the combined effects of fluoride and Er:YAG laser on human enamel. Three sound human teeth were selected and 3 windows were created on each tooth surface. The 3 windows were later subjected to the F or L or LF treatment, respectively. The Micro-XRD patterns for the 9 windows were recorded before and after the treatments. Three sections from another 3 sound human teeth were selected for Micro-FTIR investigation and 3 windows were created on the cut surface of each section. The 3 windows were later subjected to the F or L or LF treatment, respectively. The FTIR patterns for the 9 windows were recorded before and after the treatments. The results revealed that both the LF and L treatments caused the contraction in the a-aixs and the improvement in the enamel crystallinity. Though the difference in the a-axis contraction between the LF and L-treated windows was not very significant (0.006Å), this crystallographic change might suggest more than 34% decrease in the enamel solubility. In conclusion, both the L and LF therapies may improve the crystalline stability and thus acid resistance of human enamel.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.590078
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEnamel crystallinity
dc.subjectEr:YAG laser
dc.subjectMicro-FTIR
dc.subjectMicro-XRD
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentPREVENTIVE DENTISTRY
dc.description.doi10.1117/12.590078
dc.description.sourcetitleProgress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE
dc.description.volume5687
dc.description.page42-49
dc.identifier.isiut000229014900006
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.