Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.005
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Optimal Er:YAG laser energy for preventing enamel demineralization | |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, J.-F. | |
dc.contributor.author | Liu, Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stephen, H.C.-Y. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-16T05:37:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-16T05:37:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Liu, J.-F., Liu, Y., Stephen, H.C.-Y. (2006). Optimal Er:YAG laser energy for preventing enamel demineralization. Journal of Dentistry 34 (1) : 62-66. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.005 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 03005712 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46737 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal laser energy range of Er:YAG laser irradiation for laser-induced caries prevention (LICP). Methods: Twenty-one human non-carious molars were selected. The teeth were covered with nail varnish, except two 4 mm x 1 mm windows on both the buccal and lingual surfaces. The windows were randomly assigned to groups A, B, C and D, receiving no irradiation, 100, 200 and 300 mJ irradiation, respectively. The pulse width 10 pps (pulse per second) with a 1.0 mm spot size was used. After the laser treatment, each tooth was cut into two halves longitudinally. Then a two-day pH-cycling was performed, with an 18-hour demineralization followed by a 6-hour remineralization. Sections of 120±20 μm in thickness were obtained from each window. Lesion depth was measured using polarized light microscope coupled with an image analysis software. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests were used for evaluation of treatment effects. Results: The laser treatments of 100 and 200 mJ have demonstrated significant protection of enamel demineralization (p=0.01 and 0.001, respectively), but not the treatment with 300 mJ (p=0.106). A smaller lesion depth was observed for the 200 mJ group (97.1 μm) than that of the 100 mJ group (105.6 μm). Compared with the control, a lesion reduction of 32.78 and 26.93% for the 200 mJ group and the 100 mJ group were obtained, respectively. Conclusion: Caries prevention may be achieved by using Er:YAG laser treatment if the optimal range of laser parameters for LICP can be employed. © 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.005 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Caries prevention | |
dc.subject | Enamel demineralization | |
dc.subject | Er:YAG laser | |
dc.subject | Polarized light microscopy | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | PREVENTIVE DENTISTRY | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.005 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Journal of Dentistry | |
dc.description.volume | 34 | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.page | 62-66 | |
dc.description.coden | JDENA | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000234669300010 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.