Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-006-6799-2
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMoral hazard, effort sensitivity and compensation in asset-backed securitization
dc.contributor.authorFan, G.-Z.
dc.contributor.authorOng, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorSing, T.F.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-14T05:12:45Z
dc.date.available2013-10-14T05:12:45Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationFan, G.-Z., Ong, S.E., Sing, T.F. (2006). Moral hazard, effort sensitivity and compensation in asset-backed securitization. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 32 (3) : 229-251. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-006-6799-2
dc.identifier.issn08955638
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/46288
dc.description.abstractOne interesting explanation for asset securitization is the managerial agency theory-where securitization of cash flows that are relatively insensitive to managerial effort reduces the noise for cash flows that are sensitive to managerial effort (Iacobucci and Winter, 2005). This paper extends this concept in several ways. First, we differentiate the effects of noise and effort sensitivity on managerial effort and compensation, underscoring the importance of a less noisy environment. We also carefully delineate the conditions under which asset securitization would improve the welfare of managers and shareholders of the originating company. Second, we relax the assumptions regarding the expected income-producing function and the income variance, and further take into consideration the change of the marginal production of income with respect to effort before and after securitization. Third, under a multitask principal-agent model framework, we explore how the relationship between managerial activities on different assets affects the incentive compensation for the manager of the originating company and the joint surplus for shareholder and manager. This is particularly relevant when entire buildings are securitized as opposed to pools of income-generating assets. Finally, we examine the role of the third-party servicer. © Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11146-006-6799-2
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAsset-backed securitization
dc.subjectEffort sensitivity
dc.subjectManagerial compensation
dc.subjectMoral hazard
dc.subjectPrincipal-agent model
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.contributor.departmentREAL ESTATE
dc.description.doi10.1007/s11146-006-6799-2
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page229-251
dc.identifier.isiut000236372000003
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.