Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435739
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAnalysing ownership, locational and internalization advantages of Chinese construction MNCs using rough sets analysis
dc.contributor.authorPheng, L.S.
dc.contributor.authorHongbin, J.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-14T04:34:46Z
dc.date.available2013-10-14T04:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationPheng, L.S., Hongbin, J. (2006). Analysing ownership, locational and internalization advantages of Chinese construction MNCs using rough sets analysis. Construction Management and Economics 24 (11) : 1149-1165. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435739
dc.identifier.issn01446193
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45570
dc.description.abstractThe rough sets analysis focusing on the ownership, locational and internalization (OLI) advantages of Chinese construction multinational corporations (MNCs) in the international market under Dunning's Eclectic Paradigm was adopted to overcome the sample size constraint in MNC research that seeks to examine the causality patterns of the factors identified. The rough sets methodology provides a solution that conventional statistical methods do not offer to ascertain how these factors are determined and their influence in the OLI analysis of the performance of Chinese construction MNCs. The rough sets approach to handling imperfect data with uncertainty and vagueness was adopted to describe dependencies between attributes, evaluate the significance of attributes and deal with inconsistencies. Based on a questionnaire survey of 31 Chinese construction MNCs, findings from the rough sets analysis suggest, among other things, that: (1) a firm is likely to perform well in terms of its ownership advantages when it has a significant advantage on its reputation and its accessibility to resources when compared with local contractors; (2) a firm may be expected to achieve better results in terms of its locational advantages if the large number of competitors from China in the host countries becomes its most important consideration; and (3) a firm that conscientiously avoids or reduces information search and business negotiation costs would tend to perform well in terms of its internalization advantages.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01446190500435739
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectChinese multinational corporations
dc.subjectElectic paradigm
dc.subjectInternational construction
dc.subjectRough sets
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBUILDING
dc.description.doi10.1080/01446190500435739
dc.description.sourcetitleConstruction Management and Economics
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.page1149-1165
dc.description.codenCMECF
dc.identifier.isiut000213206900007
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.