Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq024
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Correcting unjust enrichments | |
dc.contributor.author | Simester, A.P. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-12T13:36:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-12T13:36:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Simester, A.P. (2010). Correcting unjust enrichments. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (3) : 579-598. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq024 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 01436503 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/45403 | |
dc.description.abstract | This review article examines R Chambers, C Mitchell and J Penner (eds), Philosophical Foundations of the Law of Unjust Enrichment. These sophisticated essays suggest that a corrective, bipolar analysis of autonomous unjust enrichment is broadly right. However, the normative rationale is complex. From the plaintiff's perspective, there are autonomy-based grounds for drawing an analogy to voidable rather than void property transactions. For similar reasons, the role of a corresponding-enrichment requirement primarily concerns identification of the defendant rather than establishing injustice. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. | |
dc.description.uri | http://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq024 | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Review | |
dc.contributor.department | LAW | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1093/ojls/gqq024 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | |
dc.description.volume | 30 | |
dc.description.issue | 3 | |
dc.description.page | 579-598 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | 000289289200007 | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.