Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/44832
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | The Impacts of Alliance Purpose and Partner Similarity on Alliance Governance | |
dc.contributor.author | Pangarkar, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Klein, S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-10T02:50:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-10T02:50:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Pangarkar, N.,Klein, S. (2001). The Impacts of Alliance Purpose and Partner Similarity on Alliance Governance. British Journal of Management 12 (4) : 341-353. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 10453172 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/44832 | |
dc.description.abstract | It is generally recognized that the governance structure of an alliance has an impact on its probability of success. In this study, we examine the choice between two alternative alliance governance structures: equity and non-equity. Drawing from transaction cost economics, two sets of factors, namely alliance purpose (R&D or marketing) and cultural distance between partners, are hypothesized to influence the above choice. We further hypothesize that collaborative R&D alliances, where both parties contribute technical knowledge, are more likely to lead to the formation of equity alliances than non-collaborative research agreements, where only one partner may be doing the research work. Based on a sample of 2407 alliances formed in the global biotechnology industry, we find partial support for the hypothesized relationships. Specifically, we find that collaborative R&D alliances are more likely to be equity alliances, whereas non-collaborative R&D alliances do not have any impact on the choice of the governance form. We also find that alliances formed with a marketing purpose are less likely to be equity alliances. We did not find any relationship between cultural distance and the choice of equity alliances. | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.department | BUSINESS POLICY | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | British Journal of Management | |
dc.description.volume | 12 | |
dc.description.issue | 4 | |
dc.description.page | 341-353 | |
dc.identifier.isiut | NOT_IN_WOS | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.