Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9057-0
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe limited relevance of culture to strategy
dc.contributor.authorSingh, K.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T06:53:56Z
dc.date.available2013-10-09T06:53:56Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationSingh, K. (2007). The limited relevance of culture to strategy. Asia Pacific Journal of Management 24 (4) : 421-428. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9057-0
dc.identifier.issn02174561
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/44313
dc.description.abstractHow are the theory and practice of strategy different in the Asia Pacific? I propose that answers to this question have gained little from incorporating culture as an explanation. There is little evidence that culture-oriented research published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management or in other management journals has substantially influenced strategy theory. Despite its value in explaining some macro- and micro-phenomena, the construct of culture has not improved understanding of firm strategy or performance. This leads to the general argument that culture has limited relevance for strategy. © 2007 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-007-9057-0
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAsia
dc.subjectCulture
dc.subjectPractice
dc.subjectStrategy
dc.subjectTheory
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentBUSINESS POLICY
dc.description.doi10.1007/s10490-007-9057-0
dc.description.sourcetitleAsia Pacific Journal of Management
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page421-428
dc.identifier.isiutNOT_IN_WOS
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.