Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00417.x
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTractable robust expected utility and risk models for portfolio optimization
dc.contributor.authorNatarajan, K.
dc.contributor.authorSim, M.
dc.contributor.authorUichanco, J.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T06:18:42Z
dc.date.available2013-10-09T06:18:42Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationNatarajan, K., Sim, M., Uichanco, J. (2010). Tractable robust expected utility and risk models for portfolio optimization. Mathematical Finance 20 (4) : 695-731. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00417.x
dc.identifier.issn09601627
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/44208
dc.description.abstractExpected utility models in portfolio optimization are based on the assumption of complete knowledge of the distribution of random returns. In this paper, we relax this assumption to the knowledge of only the mean, covariance, and support information. No additional restrictions on the type of distribution such as normality is made. The investor's utility is modeled as a piecewise-linear concave function. We derive exact and approximate optimal trading strategies for a robust (maximin) expected utility model, where the investor maximizes his worst-case expected utility over a set of ambiguous distributions. The optimal portfolios are identified using a tractable conic programming approach. Extensions of the model to capture asymmetry using partitioned statistics information and box-type uncertainty in the mean and covariance matrix are provided. Using the optimized certainty equivalent framework, we provide connections of our results with robust or ambiguous convex risk measures, in which the investor minimizes his worst-case risk under distributional ambiguity. New closed-form results for the worst-case optimized certainty equivalent risk measures and optimal portfolios are provided for two- and three-piece utility functions. For more complicated utility functions, computational experiments indicate that such robust approaches can provide good trading strategies in financial markets. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00417.x
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAmbiguity
dc.subjectConic programming
dc.subjectExpected utility
dc.subjectRobust portfolio optimization
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentMATHEMATICS
dc.contributor.departmentDECISION SCIENCES
dc.description.doi10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00417.x
dc.description.sourcetitleMathematical Finance
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.page695-731
dc.identifier.isiut000282178300007
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.