Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.011
DC FieldValue
dc.titlePrescribed learning of r.e. classes
dc.contributor.authorJain, S.
dc.contributor.authorStephan, F.
dc.contributor.authorYe, N.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-23T09:23:46Z
dc.date.available2013-07-23T09:23:46Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationJain, S., Stephan, F., Ye, N. (2009). Prescribed learning of r.e. classes. Theoretical Computer Science 410 (19) : 1796-1806. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.011
dc.identifier.issn03043975
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/43056
dc.description.abstractThis work extends studies of Angluin, Lange and Zeugmann on the dependence of learning on the hypothesis space chosen for the language class in the case of learning uniformly recursive language classes. The concepts of class-comprising (where the learner can choose a uniformly recursively enumerable superclass as the hypothesis space) and class-preserving (where the learner has to choose a uniformly recursively enumerable hypothesis space of the same class) are formulated in their study. In subsequent investigations, uniformly recursively enumerable hypothesis spaces have been considered. In the present work, we extend the above works by considering the question of whether learners can be effectively synthesized from a given hypothesis space in the context of learning uniformly recursively enumerable language classes. In our study, we introduce the concepts of prescribed learning (where there must be a learner for every uniformly recursively enumerable hypothesis space of the same class) and uniform learning (like prescribed, but the learner has to be synthesized effectively from an index of the hypothesis space). It is shown that while for explanatory learning, these four types of learnability coincide, some or all are different for other learning criteria. For example, for conservative learning, all four types are different. Several results are obtained for vacillatory and behaviourally correct learning; three of the four types can be separated, however the relation between prescribed and uniform learning remains open. It is also shown that every (not necessarily uniformly recursively enumerable) behaviourally correct learnable class has a prudent learner, that is, a learner using a hypothesis space such that the learner learns every set in the hypothesis space. Moreover the prudent learner can be effectively built from any learner for the class. © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.011
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFormal languages
dc.subjectInductive inference
dc.subjectPrescribed learning
dc.subjectRecursion theory
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMPUTER SCIENCE
dc.contributor.departmentMATHEMATICS
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.tcs.2009.01.011
dc.description.sourcetitleTheoretical Computer Science
dc.description.volume410
dc.description.issue19
dc.description.page1796-1806
dc.description.codenTCSCD
dc.identifier.isiut000265470900005
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.