Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.036
DC FieldValue
dc.titleMeasurement of body segment parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and three-dimensional geometry: An application in gait analysis
dc.contributor.authorLee, M.K.
dc.contributor.authorLe, N.S.
dc.contributor.authorFang, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorKoh, M.T.H.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-04T07:31:59Z
dc.date.available2013-07-04T07:31:59Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationLee, M.K., Le, N.S., Fang, A.C., Koh, M.T.H. (2009). Measurement of body segment parameters using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and three-dimensional geometry: An application in gait analysis. Journal of Biomechanics 42 (3) : 217-222. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.036
dc.identifier.issn00219290
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/39013
dc.description.abstractBody segment parameters (BSP) are essential input for the computations in kinetics of motion applied in the field of biomechanics. These data are usually obtained from population-specific predictive equations which present limitations in being representative of the population under study. More recently, medical imaging techniques have been adopted but are limited to two-dimensional (2-D) measurements or required extensive tomographic images for three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction. We proposed an in vivo method to measure 3-D BSP using X-ray imaging and 3-D exterior geometry. Criterion values of the BSP were determined using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which has previously been validated. Errors for all BSP values were less than 2% when values derived from our method were compared to the criterion values. We found no significant difference between our method and four selected BSP models in both stance and swing phase. Significant phase effects were observed for our method and other BSP models between stance and swing phase. Significant differences (p<0.05) between root mean square error (RMSE) ranged from 0.0177 to 0.0234 and 0.0234 to 0.097 Nm kg -1 for the knee and hip joints, respectively. However, these BSP variations brought about effects on moment output that were less than 0.09 Nm kg -1. Our findings suggest joint kinetic computations during normal gait are relatively insensitive to BSP variations. However, the influence of BSP cannot be undermined in movements that generate higher acceleration at the limbs. Considering the accuracy of our method, it could be used as a novel in vivo method to obtain direct 3-D BSP measurements. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.description.urihttp://libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.036
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subject3-D geometry
dc.subjectBody segment parameters
dc.subjectDual energy absorptiometry X-ray
dc.subjectGait
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentCOMPUTER SCIENCE
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.036
dc.description.sourcetitleJournal of Biomechanics
dc.description.volume42
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page217-222
dc.description.codenJBMCB
dc.identifier.isiut000263657600004
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.