Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1145/3561212.3561251
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Comparing Musicians and Non-musicians’ Expectations in Music and Vision | |
dc.contributor.author | Kathleen Rose Agres | |
dc.contributor.author | Ting Yuan Tay | |
dc.contributor.author | Marcus Pearce | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-23T07:45:18Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-23T07:45:18Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-10-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kathleen Rose Agres, Ting Yuan Tay, Marcus Pearce (2022-10-10). Comparing Musicians and Non-musicians’ Expectations in Music and Vision. AM '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference : 74 - 79. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1145/3561212.3561251 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-1-4503-9701-8/22/09 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/249221 | |
dc.description.abstract | The role of expectation in music has been of research interest for decades. Expectation mechanisms have also received considerable attention in vision, due in part to the widespread interest in predictive coding. Past research has uncovered different types of expectations that may be formed when exposed to a sequential stimulus, such as schematic expectation (based on general knowledge) and dynamic expectation (based on properties within the current stimulus). Yet to our knowledge, a direct comparison of the relative contribution of these types of expectation has not been performed within the same subjects through careful manipulation of stimuli, nor has this comparison been made across the musical and visual domains. This listener study aims to uncover the relative influence of dynamic and schematic expectations in musical and visual stimuli, and investigate the role of expertise in forming expectations by testing both musicians and non-musicians. Our findings suggest that musicians are indeed more sensitive than non-musicians to the dynamic and schematic properties of musical stimuli, and they generally produce a wider range of expectedness ratings than non-musicians. Interestingly, musicians also interpret schematic information in the visual condition differently than non-musicians, suggesting that musical training may have influenced their expectation mechanisms more generally. | |
dc.description.uri | https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3561212.3561251 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | ACM | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Expectation mechanisms | |
dc.subject | Music Cognition | |
dc.subject | Cross-Modal Comparisons | |
dc.type | Conference Paper | |
dc.contributor.department | YONG SIEW TOH CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1145/3561212.3561251 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | AM '22: Proceedings of the 17th International Audio Mostly Conference | |
dc.description.page | 74 - 79 | |
dc.published.state | Published | |
dc.grant.id | A20G8b0102 | |
dc.grant.fundingagency | Agency for Science, Technology and Research, A*STAR | |
Appears in Collections: | Elements Staff Publications |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3561212.3561251.pdf | 627.66 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Published | View/Download |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License