Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.001
Title: Demystifying energy savings from dynamic temperature setpoints under weather and occupancy variability
Authors: Talami, R 
Dawoodjee, I 
Ghahramani, A 
Issue Date: 1-Dec-2024
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Citation: Talami, R, Dawoodjee, I, Ghahramani, A (2024-12-01). Demystifying energy savings from dynamic temperature setpoints under weather and occupancy variability. Energy and Built Environment 5 (6) : 878-888. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.001
Abstract: Building temperature setpoints affect both HVAC energy consumption and occupant comfort. To reduce HVAC energy usage, researchers often investigate how system operations can be optimized under weather and occupancy variability subject to a fixed setpoint that minimizes any possible discomfort. While previous research has explored the selection of dynamic setpoints to minimize HVAC energy consumption based on outdoor temperature, they have often neglected the impact of varying occupancy rates on the setpoints. This paper aims to demystify energy savings derived from fixed and dynamic temperature setpoints under weather and occupancy variability and explores the additional energy savings that can be achieved through dynamic temperature setpoints. An exhaustive HVAC zone temperature setpoint optimizer was developed to determine dynamic setpoints with respect to weather and occupancy (i.e., setpoints that minimize HVAC energy consumption at different occupancy rates based on outdoor weather). U.S. DOE reference building energy models for small, medium, and large office buildings were simulated at 17 climate zones, 4 occupancy rates (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) and 7 setpoints (19.5°C to 25.5°C at 1°C interval). It was found that, both fixed and dynamic setpoints benefit from the energy reduction of approximately 2-4% from the lower heat generated by the occupants at lower occupancy rates. However, at outdoor temperatures between 5°C and 32°C where occupant heat loads can swing the building between heating, free-running, and cooling modes, dynamic setpoints yield additional 2-10% energy savings, compared to fixed setpoints.
Source Title: Energy and Built Environment
URI: https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/248427
ISSN: 2666-1233
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.07.001
Appears in Collections:Elements
Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
1-s2.0-S2666123323000612-main.pdfPublished version2.44 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.