Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05217-6
DC FieldValue
dc.titleAccuracy of the American Association of Endodontists diagnostic criteria for assessing pulp health in primary teeth
dc.contributor.authorDhillon, Ishreen Kaur
dc.contributor.authorHong, Catherine Hsu-Ling
dc.contributor.authorHu, Shijia
dc.contributor.authorSim, Yu Fan
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Benny Kwee Chien
dc.contributor.authorDuggal, Mandeep Singh
dc.contributor.authorSriram, Gopu
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-19T04:04:30Z
dc.date.available2024-02-19T04:04:30Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-01
dc.identifier.citationDhillon, Ishreen Kaur, Hong, Catherine Hsu-Ling, Hu, Shijia, Sim, Yu Fan, Goh, Benny Kwee Chien, Duggal, Mandeep Singh, Sriram, Gopu (2023-10-01). Accuracy of the American Association of Endodontists diagnostic criteria for assessing pulp health in primary teeth. CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS 27 (10). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05217-6
dc.identifier.issn1432-6981
dc.identifier.issn1436-3771
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/247159
dc.description.abstractObjectives: There is a lack of studies evaluating the accuracy of the 2009 American Association of Endodontists (AAE) diagnostic criteria for diagnosing pulpal health in primary teeth. This study aimed to estimate and correlate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical diagnosis of reversible and irreversible pulpitis using the 2009 AAE criteria with histological findings in primary teeth. Methods: Eighty primary teeth that were clinically diagnosed with normal pulp (n = 10), reversible pulpitis (n = 30), irreversible pulpitis (n = 30) and pulp necrosis (n = 10) were collected. The teeth were histo-processed, and pulp tissues were diagnosed histologically as uninflamed pulp, reversible or irreversibly inflamed and necrosis based on previously proposed criteria. Results: The clinical diagnosis of pulp necrosis (sensitivity 70%, specificity 96%) and normal pulp (sensitivity 91%, specificity 100%) matched the histological diagnosis of necrosis and uninflamed pulp in 70% and 100%, respectively. The clinical diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis (sensitivity 64%, specificity 72%) matched the histological diagnosis of irreversible pulp inflammation for 47% of teeth evaluated. For the clinical diagnosis of reversible pulpitis (sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 86%), 80% matched the histological diagnosis of reversible pulp inflammation. Teeth with histologically diagnosed irreversible pulp inflammation were more likely to have lingering (OR 5.08; 95% CI 1.48–17.46, P = 0.010) and nocturnal tooth pain (OR 15.86; 95% CI 1.57–160.47, P = 0.019) when compared to teeth with reversible pulp inflammation. Using the classification and regression tree model, the presence of widened periodontal ligament space and nocturnal tooth pain were useful predictors of irreversible pulp inflammation with an accuracy of 78%. Conclusion: The 2009 AAE criteria was acceptable for primary teeth with pulp necrosis and normal pulp but poor for reversible pulpitis and irreversible pulpitis.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectDiagnosis
dc.subjectDental pulp diseases
dc.subjectTooth, deciduous
dc.subjectSensitivity and specificity
dc.subjectHistology
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2024-02-19T02:46:53Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DENTISTRY)
dc.description.doi10.1007/s00784-023-05217-6
dc.description.sourcetitleCLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
dc.description.volume27
dc.description.issue10
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
s00784-023-05217-6.pdfPublished version1.38 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

Published

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.