Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1159/000533635
DC FieldValue
dc.titleThe Healthy Ageing Questionnaire Index: Validation in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study
dc.contributor.authorTze Pin Ng
dc.contributor.authorXinyi Gwee
dc.contributor.authorDenise Q.L. Chua
dc.contributor.authorShiou Liang Wee
dc.contributor.authorChin Yee Cheong
dc.contributor.authorPhilip Lin Kiat Yap
dc.contributor.authorKeng Bee Yap
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-03T01:52:47Z
dc.date.available2023-11-03T01:52:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-28
dc.identifier.citationTze Pin Ng, Xinyi Gwee, Denise Q.L. Chua, Shiou Liang Wee, Chin Yee Cheong, Philip Lin Kiat Yap, Keng Bee Yap (2023-08-28). The Healthy Ageing Questionnaire Index: Validation in the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study. Gerontology 69 (11). ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1159/000533635
dc.identifier.issn0304-324X
dc.identifier.issn1423-0003
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/245709
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Healthy ageing (HA) indices typically use full questionnaire, performance- or blood-based assessment of functional ability which are time-consuming and resource-intensive. We developed and validated a simple and brief Healthy Ageing Questionnaire (HAQ) index with comparable measurement accuracy. Methods: The 15-item HAQ (scored 0–100) was developed using data of 500 participants in the Singapore Study of Successful Ageing (SSOSA), a sub-cohort of the Singapore Longitudinal Ageing Study (SLAS-2). Its construct, concurrent, and predictive validity were evaluated in 2,161 participants in the SLAS-2 who were non-participants of the SSOSA. Results: The HAQ index (mean = 64.0, SD = 11.8) showed a coherent 3-factor structure (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.735). HAQ scores were higher among participants who were female, highly educated, not living alone, non-smoking, non-alcohol drinkers, not at risk of malnutrition, were robust or pre-frail, not disabled, had no or <5 medical conditions, and no recent fall or hospitalization. It was positively correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination and life satisfaction, and negatively correlated with age, logMAR vision, 5 times sit-and-stand, and timed-up-and-go. The HAQ index was significantly correlated but showed modest concordance with the Rowe-Kahn SA index. Increasing HAQ index quintiles were associated with decreased mortality risks from 40.6 to 9.7 deaths per 1,000 person-years; covariate-adjusted hazard ratio for the highest Q5 levels (HAQ score >70) was 0.44 (95% CI = 0.28–0.67). Using receiver operating characteristics analysis of predictive accuracy for survival, the area under the curve of HAQ was 0.675, and Rowe-Kahn SA index was 0.660 (p = 0.361). Conclusion: The HAQ is a brief and accurate HA index that is potentially useful across diverse settings and purposes in research, healthcare, and policy-making.
dc.publisherS. Karger AG
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceKarger 2023
dc.subjectIntrinsic capacity
dc.subjectSuccessful ageing
dc.subjectFunctional ability
dc.subjectBrief questionnaire
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.contributor.departmentMEDICINE
dc.contributor.departmentPSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
dc.description.doi10.1159/000533635
dc.description.sourcetitleGerontology
dc.description.volume69
dc.description.issue11
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
GER533635.pdf353.1 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons