Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.035
DC FieldValue
dc.titleIncidence of Group B Streptococcus early onset sepsis in term neonates with second-line prophylaxis maternal intrapartum antibiotics: A multicenter retrospective study
dc.contributor.authorMing LOW, Jia
dc.contributor.authorHau LEE, Jan
dc.contributor.authorFOOTE, Henry P
dc.contributor.authorHORNIK, Christoph P
dc.contributor.authorCLARK, Reese H
dc.contributor.authorGREENBERG, Rachel G
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-30T04:00:12Z
dc.date.available2023-10-30T04:00:12Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.citationMing LOW, Jia, Hau LEE, Jan, FOOTE, Henry P, HORNIK, Christoph P, CLARK, Reese H, GREENBERG, Rachel G (2023-10). Incidence of Group B Streptococcus early onset sepsis in term neonates with second-line prophylaxis maternal intrapartum antibiotics: A multicenter retrospective study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.035
dc.identifier.issn0002-9378
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/245615
dc.description.abstractBackground: The difference in incidence of early onset sepsis (EOS) caused by Group B Streptococcus (GBS) among term neonates whose mothers receive first versus second-line intrapartum prophylaxis is poorly described. Objective: To compare the incidence of GBS EOS in term neonates born to mothers who receive first, second-line or no intrapartum antibiotics, and describe the short term and survival outcomes of neonates who developed GBS EOS stratified by maternal antepartum prophylaxis. Study design: This was a retrospective review of electronic medical records. We queried the Pediatrix Medical Group Clinical Data Warehouse to evaluate the outcomes of term neonates born to GBS positive mothers between 2003 - 2020, and compared the incidence and outcomes of neonates with GBS EOS whose mothers received first versus second-line/no intrapartum prophylaxis. Results: Among 496,180 neonates, 104,196 (21%) were born to GBS positive mothers. Out of 97,983 GBS positive mothers with adequate prenatal antibiotic documentation, 49,234 (50%), 12,679 (13%) and 36,070 (37%) received first-line, second-line and no intrapartum prophylaxis, respectively. Incidence of GBS EOS among all neonates with maternal GBS carriage was 0.22% (231/104,196). Neonates whose mothers received second-line intrapartum antibiotics and no antibiotics had higher risk of GBS EOS infection compared to first-line intrapartum antibiotics [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.66 - 6.38 and aOR 3.80, 95% CI: 2.66 - 5.44, respectively]. No statistically significant difference in the risk of GBS EOS in neonates born to mothers who received second-line versus no antibiotics (aOR 0.92, 95% CI: 0.64 - 1.33). Conclusion: Neonates exposed to second-line maternal GBS prophylaxis had increased risk of GBS EOS compared to those exposed to first-line maternal GBS prophylaxis. There was no statistically significant difference in GBS EOS incidence between second-line versus no antibiotics in mothers with GBS carriage.
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectdatabase
dc.subjectGroup B Streptococcus
dc.subjectneonates
dc.subjectmaternal intrapartum antibiotics
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-10-26T06:40:52Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (DUKE-NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL)
dc.contributor.departmentPAEDIATRICS
dc.description.doi10.1016/j.ajog.2023.10.035
dc.description.sourcetitleAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
1-s2.0-S0002937823007718-main.pdf1.48 MBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.