Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000282
DC Field | Value | |
---|---|---|
dc.title | Heirs to What Had Been Accomplished: D. N. Aidit, the PKI, and Maoism, 1950-1965 | |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, Hongxuan | |
dc.contributor.author | Galway, M | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-16T04:29:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-16T04:29:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023-09-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lin, Hongxuan, Galway, M (2023-09-18). Heirs to What Had Been Accomplished: D. N. Aidit, the PKI, and Maoism, 1950-1965. Modern Intellectual History 20 (3) : 883-911. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000282 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1479-2443 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1479-2451 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/245348 | |
dc.description.abstract | Why did the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI) pursue a nonviolent, collaborative, and parliamentary path to power? How did it secure major electoral successes? The answers to both queries have much to do with the PKI's adaptation of Maoism. Although scholars recognize that Maoism was influential on PKI theory and praxis, they have hitherto underevaluated the extent to which PKI leaders, notably Dipa Nusantara Aidit and Muhammad Hatta Lukman, engaged with Mao's ideas and how such ideas informed policy. Through textual exegesis of PKI leaders' writings and speeches, our article argues that the PKI's "Indonesianization"of Marxism-Leninism drew from several Maoist texts, but differed in its composition in a number of important ways. "Indonesianization"entailed cross-class alliances, the political agency of the peasantry, willingness to cooperate with parties across the political spectrum, and, most innovatively, a nonviolent agenda. The PKI also demonstrated an adaptive willingness to learn from all, while remaining beholden to none. Our goal is to show how PKI leaders spoke back in their dialectical engagement with Maoism, as Maoism, for them, did not constitute a static, orthodox, or monolithic thing. Instead, Maoism was for Aidit and Lukman an ideological system within which lay an ideological discourse, critical interpretive paradigm, historical revolutionary experience, military strategy, and blueprint to socialist development against which to juxtapose their ideas and grand visions. | |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) | |
dc.source | Elements | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.date.updated | 2023-10-16T03:44:05Z | |
dc.contributor.department | SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES | |
dc.description.doi | 10.1017/S1479244322000282 | |
dc.description.sourcetitle | Modern Intellectual History | |
dc.description.volume | 20 | |
dc.description.issue | 3 | |
dc.description.page | 883-911 | |
dc.published.state | Published | |
Appears in Collections: | Staff Publications Elements |
Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | Access Settings | Version | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lin and Galway, Heirs to What Had Been Accomplished (MIH final version).pdf | Published version | 315.67 kB | Adobe PDF | OPEN | Published | View/Download |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.