Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000282
DC FieldValue
dc.titleHeirs to What Had Been Accomplished: D. N. Aidit, the PKI, and Maoism, 1950-1965
dc.contributor.authorLin, Hongxuan
dc.contributor.authorGalway, M
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-16T04:29:20Z
dc.date.available2023-10-16T04:29:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-18
dc.identifier.citationLin, Hongxuan, Galway, M (2023-09-18). Heirs to What Had Been Accomplished: D. N. Aidit, the PKI, and Maoism, 1950-1965. Modern Intellectual History 20 (3) : 883-911. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479244322000282
dc.identifier.issn1479-2443
dc.identifier.issn1479-2451
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/245348
dc.description.abstractWhy did the Communist Party of Indonesia (PKI) pursue a nonviolent, collaborative, and parliamentary path to power? How did it secure major electoral successes? The answers to both queries have much to do with the PKI's adaptation of Maoism. Although scholars recognize that Maoism was influential on PKI theory and praxis, they have hitherto underevaluated the extent to which PKI leaders, notably Dipa Nusantara Aidit and Muhammad Hatta Lukman, engaged with Mao's ideas and how such ideas informed policy. Through textual exegesis of PKI leaders' writings and speeches, our article argues that the PKI's "Indonesianization"of Marxism-Leninism drew from several Maoist texts, but differed in its composition in a number of important ways. "Indonesianization"entailed cross-class alliances, the political agency of the peasantry, willingness to cooperate with parties across the political spectrum, and, most innovatively, a nonviolent agenda. The PKI also demonstrated an adaptive willingness to learn from all, while remaining beholden to none. Our goal is to show how PKI leaders spoke back in their dialectical engagement with Maoism, as Maoism, for them, did not constitute a static, orthodox, or monolithic thing. Instead, Maoism was for Aidit and Lukman an ideological system within which lay an ideological discourse, critical interpretive paradigm, historical revolutionary experience, military strategy, and blueprint to socialist development against which to juxtapose their ideas and grand visions.
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.sourceElements
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-10-16T03:44:05Z
dc.contributor.departmentSOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES
dc.description.doi10.1017/S1479244322000282
dc.description.sourcetitleModern Intellectual History
dc.description.volume20
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page883-911
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Lin and Galway, Heirs to What Had Been Accomplished (MIH final version).pdfPublished version315.67 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.