Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221130467
DC FieldValue
dc.titleCorporate Digital Responsibility in Service Firms and Their Ecosystems
dc.contributor.authorWirtz, Jochen
dc.contributor.authorKunz, Werner H
dc.contributor.authorHartley, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorTarbit, James
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-09T05:59:22Z
dc.date.available2023-10-09T05:59:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-05
dc.identifier.citationWirtz, Jochen, Kunz, Werner H, Hartley, Nicole, Tarbit, James (2023-05). Corporate Digital Responsibility in Service Firms and Their Ecosystems. JOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH 26 (2) : 173-190. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221130467
dc.identifier.issn1094-6705
dc.identifier.issn1552-7379
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/245200
dc.description.abstractDigitization, artificial intelligence, and service robots carry serious ethical, privacy, and fairness risks. Using the lens of corporate digital responsibility (CDR), we examine these risks and their mitigation in service firms and make five contributions. First, we show that CDR is critical in service contexts because of the vast streams of customer data involved and digital service technology’s omnipresence, opacity, and complexity. Second, we synthesize the ethics, privacy, and fairness literature using the CDR data and technology life-cycle perspective to understand better the nature of these risks in a service context. Third, to provide insights on the origins of these risks, we examine the digital service ecosystem and the related flows of money, service, data, insights, and technologies. Fourth, we deduct that the underlying causes of CDR issues are trade-offs between good CDR practices and organizational objectives (e.g., profit opportunities versus CDR risks) and introduce the CDR calculus to capture this. We also conclude that regulation will need to step in when a firm’s CDR calculus becomes so negative that good CDR is unlikely. Finally, we advance a set of strategies, tools, and practices service firms can use to manage these trade-offs and build a strong CDR culture.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectBusiness
dc.subjectBusiness & Economics
dc.subjectcorporate digital responsibility
dc.subjectartificial intelligence
dc.subjectdata
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectprivacy
dc.subjectfairness
dc.subjectBRAVE-NEW-WORLD
dc.subjectBIG DATA
dc.subjectARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE
dc.subjectETHICAL-ISSUES
dc.subjectPRIVACY
dc.subjectCHALLENGES
dc.subjectONLINE
dc.subjectROBOTS
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-10-08T16:51:53Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (BIZ)
dc.description.doi10.1177/10946705221130467
dc.description.sourcetitleJOURNAL OF SERVICE RESEARCH
dc.description.volume26
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.page173-190
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Wirtz et al, 2023_JSR, CDR, Online Appendix.pdfSupporting information861.77 kBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download
Wirtz et al, 2023, JSR, CDR in Service Firms.pdfPublished version1.33 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download
Wirtz et al, 2023, JSR, CDR in Service Firms_Video Slide Deck.pdfSupporting information1.14 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.