VEILED HOMOPHOBIA: ANALYSIS OF ANTI-GENDER DISCOURSES IN SINGAPORE MUSLIM FRIDAY SERMONS

Abstract

In 2022, the state announced the repeal of Penal Code 377A, which criminalised men’s same-sex relationships. The change was made as a step towards greater inclusivity; however, it has become a cause for amplifying conservative voices by some institutions, especially some religious organizations. Given this context, this thesis explores the hidden homophobic and anti-genderism discourses found in selected weekly sermons organised by the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (also known as MUIS). Drawing on theoretical concepts of affective regimes and indexicality, the thesis analyses the ways in which MUIS constructs and reinforces subtly negative attitudes toward LGBTQ+ individuals. The thesis argues that MUIS aligns with the cisheteronormative national ideologies to promote a narrow definition of family, marriage, and parenthood, which contribute to the perpetuation of homophobia and anti-genderism. While the study focuses on sensitive data and a politically charged topic, it is not intended as a political statement but as a linguistic analysis of how institutional discourses influence society, as in an investigation of language and power. The research aims to contribute to the ongoing global scholarly discussion on anti-genderism, inclusivity, and diversity by providing a timely and relevant example of the issues faced by LGBTQ+ individuals in Singapore. The study adds to the under-discussed field of sociolinguistic research on LGBTQ+ issues in Singapore, namely, that of the Muslim community. The findings suggest that homophobia and discrimination against sexual minorities are still highly prevalent in post-377A Singapore. Thus, from a viewpoint of dominant discourse and language and power, there is a need for continued efforts to combat systematised discrimination against minorities while promoting their acceptance by the public. Overall, this case study sheds light on the ways in which the conservative religious institution in Singapore continues to resist societal change toward inclusivity. The linguistic findings reinforce the need for ongoing efforts to combat discrimination and promote acceptance.