Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00174-4
DC FieldValue
dc.titleTraining STEM Ph.D. Students to Deal with Moral Dilemmas
dc.contributor.authorRashid, Rafi
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-17T09:21:49Z
dc.date.available2023-07-17T09:21:49Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-01
dc.identifier.citationRashid, Rafi (2020-06-01). Training STEM Ph.D. Students to Deal with Moral Dilemmas. SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS 26 (3) : 1861-1872. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00174-4
dc.identifier.issn1353-3452
dc.identifier.issn1471-5546
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/243145
dc.description.abstractResearch in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields has become much more complex in the twenty-first century. As a result, the students of our Graduate School, who are all Ph.D. candidates, need to be trained in essential skills and processes that are crucial for success in academia and beyond. Some research problems are inherently complex in that they raise deep moral dilemmas, such as antimicrobial resistance, sustainability, dual-use research of concern (defined as well-intentioned scientific research that may be misused for nefarious purposes), and human cloning. Dealing with moral dilemmas is one of several core competencies that twenty-first-century Ph.D. students must acquire. However, this might prove difficult for STEM Ph.D. students who have had limited exposure to moral philosophy. Since the task of dealing with moral dilemmas in STEM research requires input from both scientific and philosophical disciplines, it is argued with the help of the 4 examples above that this task be explicitly modelled as an interdisciplinary process. Furthermore, it is argued that a particular model from the interdisciplinary education literature could serve as a learning tool to support ethical decision-making in research ethics and integrity courses for doctoral students.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectSocial Sciences
dc.subjectScience & Technology
dc.subjectArts & Humanities
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectEthics
dc.subjectEngineering, Multidisciplinary
dc.subjectHistory & Philosophy Of Science
dc.subjectMultidisciplinary Sciences
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectSocial Sciences - Other Topics
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectHistory & Philosophy of Science
dc.subjectScience & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subjectApplied ethics
dc.subjectResponsible conduct of research (RCR)
dc.subjectCritical thinking
dc.subjectBroad Model
dc.subjectCollaboration
dc.subjectDoctoral education
dc.subjectSCIENCE
dc.typeEditorial
dc.date.updated2023-07-17T07:09:13Z
dc.contributor.departmentNUS GRADUATE SCHOOL
dc.description.doi10.1007/s11948-019-00174-4
dc.description.sourcetitleSCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS
dc.description.volume26
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.page1861-1872
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Rashid2020_Article_TrainingSTEMPhDStudentsToDealW.pdfPublished version518.78 kBAdobe PDF

CLOSED

None

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.