Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65
DC FieldValue
dc.titleEffects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival
dc.contributor.authorDickens, BL
dc.contributor.authorBrant, HL
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-06T02:01:57Z
dc.date.available2023-07-06T02:01:57Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-12
dc.identifier.citationDickens, BL, Brant, HL (2014-02-12). Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival. Parasites and Vectors 7 (1) : 65-. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-65
dc.identifier.issn1756-3305
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/242809
dc.description.abstractBackground: Tracking the movement of mosquitoes and understanding dispersal dynamics is essential for the control and prevention of vector-borne diseases. A variety of marking techniques have been used, including dusts and dyes. Methods. In this study, Aedes aegypti were marked using fluorescent dusts ('DayGlo': A-19 Horizon Blue & A-13-N Rocket Red; 'Brian Clegg': pink, blue & red), fluorescent paints ('Brian Clegg': blue, red & yellow) and metallic gold dust ('Brian Clegg'). Dusting methods were those previously used in mark-release-recapture experiments, including application with a bulb duster, creation of a dust storm or shaking in a bag. Results: Results showed marking mosquitoes using a dust storm allowed relatively high survival, compared to unmarked controls (Males: χ2 = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.07; Females: χ2 = 3.24, df = 4, p = 0.04), and high marking efficiency. Using a bulb duster showed high survival in male mosquitoes (χ2 = 12.59, df = 4, p < 0.000), but low survival in female mosquitoes during the first 15 days of the study (χ2 = 5.17, df = 4, p < 0.05). The bulb duster also had the lowest marking efficiency compared to other dry marking techniques. The bag method showed low survival in males during the first 15 days of the study (χ2 = 5.77, df = 4, p < 0.05). Applying paints had an overall negative impact on survival for males (χ2 = 5.03, df = 3, p < 0.05), but not for females (χ2 = 0.19, df = 3, p = 0.661). Males dusted with DayGlo Horizon Blue dust, and females dusted with DayGlo Rocket Red dust, had the most significant reduction in survivorship in comparison to the control (Males: χ2 = 15.70, df = 6, p < 0.000; Females: χ2 = 24.47, df = 6, p < 0.000). Mosquitoes marked with Brian Clegg gold dust showed mortality rates similar to controls within male mosquitoes (χ2 = 0.18, df = 6, p = 0.674), but significantly lower in females (χ2 = 16.59, df = 6, p < 0.000). Conclusions: This study showed that marking technique and colour can have a significant impact on the survival and marking coverage of a mosquito. © 2014 Dickens and Brant; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.sourceElements
dc.subjectAedes
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFluorescent Dyes
dc.subjectInsect Vectors
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectOrganic Chemicals
dc.subjectPopulation Density
dc.subjectPopulation Dynamics
dc.typeArticle
dc.date.updated2023-07-05T13:28:36Z
dc.contributor.departmentDEAN'S OFFICE (SSH SCH OF PUBLIC HEALTH)
dc.description.doi10.1186/1756-3305-7-65
dc.description.sourcetitleParasites and Vectors
dc.description.volume7
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.page65-
dc.published.statePublished
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications
Elements

Show simple item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
Effects of marking methods and fluorescent dusts on Aedes aegypti survival.pdf1.12 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

PublishedView/Download

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.